My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2010-07-23_ENFORCEMENT - C1981008
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Enforcement
>
Coal
>
C1981008
>
2010-07-23_ENFORCEMENT - C1981008
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 4:16:42 PM
Creation date
7/23/2010 2:47:45 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981008
IBM Index Class Name
ENFORCEMENT
Doc Date
7/23/2010
Doc Name
Email from Greg Lewicki
From
Greg Lewicki
To
DRMS
Violation No.
CV2010003
Email Name
DIH
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
I Specific level depends upon clay mineralogy, soil texture, and saturation percentage according to Dollhopf et al., <br />1983. <br />a The specific percentage of clay or sand allowed will depend upon clay mineralogy, organic matter content, <br />consistence, soil lift, spoil characteristics, and size of sand fraction. <br />5 These values may vary depending upon the plant species proposed for revegetation in specific locations (e.g., a <br />soil with a high coarse fragment content throughout its profile may be completely salvaged if used for rangeland <br />versus cropland postmine land use). Prime farmland will not have >10% cobbles and boulders (3 inches mean <br />diameter and greater) and 15% coarse fraction (caught in a 2 millimeter sieve) by volume. The % volume is <br />estimated visually. <br />'This value for selenium was chosen based on guidance from Dave Dearstyne of NRCS and recent data that other <br />states are using. Dave is currently working extensively (2008) with the Selenium Task Force on the western slope <br />and is very knowledgeable about this issue. He basically stated that there is no concern for selenium unless Mancos <br />shale strata is being placed near the surface. At the new Horizon #2 Mine, no Mancos shale is placed near the <br />surface. Also, all tests of selenium in the pre-mine soil survey of 1998 show all values less than 0.1 ppm. The <br />suitability report of the bench 1 material used as subsoil on the previously backfilled portion of the Morgan property <br />in early 2008 show <1 ppm in all tests. Dave Dearstyne believes a threshold suitability level of 0.2 ppm in the Lift A <br />material and 1.0 ppm in the Lift B material is adequate. These are the levels proposed. <br />In cases where the Bench 1 material is used as the Lift B soil in prime farmland, it will meet the <br />specifications for Lift B, as outlined in Table 2.04.9-2. <br />These suitability evaluations, based on averages across the study area, were used for topsoil <br />volume determinations presented in the Topsoil Management Plan section of this Section <br />2.05.4(2)(d), Topsoil (Redistribution). The number of profiles on which these averages are <br />based is noted in the Soil Profile descriptions range of characteristics. The recommended <br />topsoil salvage depths for each map unit are weighted averages of each major component of <br />the map unit (those listed in the map unit name - for both associations and complexes) as well <br />as major soil inclusions as presented within the map units. <br />(Revised July 2008) 2.05.4(2)(d)-15
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.