2010-07-20_REVISION - M2000158

• Permit No: M2000158
• IBM Index Class Name: REVISION
• Doc Date: 7/20/2010
• Doc Name: Adequacy Review #2
• From: DRMS
• To: Civil Resources, LLC
• Type & Sequence: AM2
• Email Name: JLE
• Email Name: AJW
• Media Type: D
• Archive: No

STATE OF COLORADO
DIVISION OF RECLAMATION, MINING AND SAFETY
Department of Natural Resources °
1313 Sherman St., Room 215
Denver, Colorado 80203

Phone: [phone]
COLORADO
D I V I s[ o N o f
FAX: [phone] RECLAMATION
MINING

&
- _
SAFE
TY
Bill Ritter, Jr.
Governor
Mike King
July 20, 2010 Executive Director
Loretta E. Pineda
Danna Ortiz Director
t,"'C"ivil Resources, LLC
323 5th Street; P.O. Box 680
Frederick, Colorado 80530
RE: S & H Mine; DRMS File No. M-2000-158; Amendment 02, Adequacy Review #2
Dear Mrs. Ortiz,
The Division of Reclamation, Mining and Safety (Division) has completed its review of your
response to the first adequacy review of the amendment application, Per your request in item
#9 of the adequacy review, the decision date has been extended to August 15th, 2010. Please be
advised that if you are unable to satisfactorily address any concerns identified in this review
before the decision date, it will be your responsibility to request an extension of the review
period. If there are outstanding issues that have not been adequately addressed prior to the
end of the review period, and no extension has been requested, the Division will deny this
application.
6.4.3 EXHIBIT C - Pre-mining and Mining Plan Map(s) of Affected Lands
1.) Several corrections and additions will need to be made to the Exhibit C map. In order to
avoid redundancy, the necessary corrections are discussed in the Exhibit sections below.
6.4.4 EXHIBIT D - Mining Plan
2.) In response to item #9, the Division will extend the decision date to August 15th, 2010 to give
the applicant enough time to obtain approval from the SEO for the Design Report for the
proposed embankments.
6.4.5 EXHIBIT E - Reclamation Plan
3.) In reference to your response to item 16 and 17 of the first adequacy review, please explain
how the Operator intends on excavating material from the overburden borrow areas and not
lowering the grade in the topography? Will there be enough material to backfill these areas to
the original grade adjacent to the floodway?
4.) The response to item 17 references the Permanent Erosion Control Plan submitted in
Attachment D. However, the information submitted in this attachment are the designs for the
Office of
Mined Land Reclamation Denver a Grand Junction A Durango Office of
Active and Inactive Mines