My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2010-07-15_REPORT - M1988044 (2)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Report
>
Minerals
>
M1988044
>
2010-07-15_REPORT - M1988044 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 4:16:13 PM
Creation date
7/19/2010 7:34:29 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1988044
IBM Index Class Name
REPORT
Doc Date
7/15/2010
Doc Name
2010 Annual Report to Colorado Board of Land Commissioners
From
Mark A. Heifner
To
DRMS
Email Name
JLE
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
The general stream channel in this area has continued to develop a strong growth of <br />cottonwood and willow. This is a major shift in composition from what it was before grazing was <br />removed. At that time the area was dominated by beaten and damaged willows and grossly distorted <br />cottonwoods that had been affected by browsing during the winter months. Now, the cottonwoods <br />are growing rapidly and in some places dominate the willows, but in other places the willows have <br />established an almost impenetrable wall of vegetation in the stream bed. <br />MINING ACTIVITY IN THE LAST YEAR: <br />1. Depth of mining - In the last year, mining depths were extremely variable due to the <br />spotty and highly variable configuration of the remaining sand. In many instances, mining <br />depth was quite deep, but also very large amounts of overburden and waste (wash fines) were <br />generated. The waste is mostly located near the plant and comes from pond cleanings. Soils <br />were exceptionally deep in some places which generated large volumes of soil for backfilling. <br />Much of this soil is from deeper horizons and therefore of limited value for reclamation uses <br />other than for filling. All mining was in compliance with the depth requirements. <br />2. Backfilling - Backfilling of mined areas has increased a little in the last year. As described <br />in the plan, mining continues in a deposit until the mining limit is reached or the deposit <br />ends. <br />A. Depth of backfilling - Backfilling that was done exhibited previous patterns of <br />achieving greater depths of fill than would normally be expected. <br />B. Material used in backfilling - Most of the backfilling has used overburden and <br />subsoils stripped from the site where the filling is being done or at least sites that were <br />near enough to the backfilling that it is still considered to be original material. This is <br />consistent with the method of operation described in the plans. Other sources of <br />material include wash fines from processing plant pond cleaning. <br />C. Maximum, minimum, and average slopes - Finished slopes in all the backfilled, <br />graded and topsoiled areas are rarely even close to the 5:1 limit. Most are in the 7:1 to <br />15:1 or less steep range. The average for backfilled areas in the last year is probably <br />about 7:1 with only a few areas nearly level and steeper slopes being up to 5:1 over <br />small areas. <br />D. Deviation from original elevation for new backfilled land - As described in last <br />year's report, in many areas treated this year, the deviations from the original <br />elevation amounts to only a few feet and when compared to the original topography <br />map it is hard to even determine how much mining was actually done. No actual <br />measurements were taken prior to mining as most of these areas are much older and <br />pre-amendment. <br />Status report for 2009 due July 15, 2010 Page 6 of 11
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.