My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2010-07-01_REPORT - C1981010
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Report
>
Coal
>
C1981010
>
2010-07-01_REPORT - C1981010
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 4:14:29 PM
Creation date
7/12/2010 10:20:31 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981010
IBM Index Class Name
REPORT
Doc Date
7/1/2010
Doc Name
Review of March 2010 Geotechnical Monitoring Report (Memo)
From
Marcia Talvitie
To
Rob Zuber
Permit Index Doc Type
Stability Report
Email Name
MLT
SB1
RDZ
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Trapper Mine <br />March 2010 GMR Review <br />Page 2 of 2 <br />Review of March 2010 GMR <br />The March 2010 GMR reports data collected from the four new sites between October <br />15, 2009 and March 29, 2010. The Division's review comments are provided below. <br />Inclinometers <br />Inclinometer readings for the four sites show that little to no change occurred over the <br />previous 5- %2 months of monitoring. TMI concludes that there has been no significant <br />movement in the inclinometers during the monitoring period. <br />The Division does have one request. for each installation, two readings are reported, <br />e.g. INl IPI I-R and 1-R,2. Please provide a brief description of the inclinometer <br />installations (are the two sensors on different axes?) and significance of the two <br />separate readings. <br />Piezometers <br />Upon its review of the piezometer data, TMI states that variations in pressures at the <br />various locations have not been a concern at this time. <br />The Division has reviewed the piezometer data, and does have one item for TMI to <br />review. For piezometers installed in Stations 1, 2 and 3, the deeper sensor exhibits the <br />greater piezometric pressure. At Station 4, the L sensor (at a depth of 81.8 feet) shows 17 <br />to 18 psi while the LM sensor (145.9-foot depth) reads approximately 0 psi. Is this zero <br />reading to be expected at this depth? LM sensors at Stations 1 and 2 are -25 psi and -19 <br />psi, respectively. <br />Please review the data for the LM sensor at Station 4, and further explain the zero psi <br />reading if it is determined to be an accurate depiction of conditions at the location. <br />Resolution of Previous Items <br />With my review of TMI's September 2009 Report, I noted that data for benchmark 07- <br />GI6 BM, collected on 9/8/09, appeared to be anomalous when compared with prior <br />readings at that location. With the current GMR, TMI has provided a replacement page <br />with corrected data. <br />This item has been satisfactorily resolved. <br />This concludes my review of the March 2010 Geotechnical Monitoring Report for the <br />Trapper Mine. Please feel free to contact me with any questions that may arise.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.