My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2010-07-12_REVISION - C1996083 (2)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Coal
>
C1996083
>
2010-07-12_REVISION - C1996083 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 4:15:39 PM
Creation date
7/12/2010 10:20:22 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1996083
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
7/12/2010
Doc Name
Adequacy Response No. 2
From
J.E. Stover & Associates, Inc
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
PR12
Email Name
JJD
SB1
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
J. J. Dudash -7- July 8, 2010 <br />Section 2.05.6 Mitigation of the Impacts of Mining Operations <br />42. This issue is resolved. <br />43.This issue is resolved. <br />44.This issue is resolved. <br />45. This issue is resolved. <br />46.This issue is resolved. <br />47. This issue is resolved. <br />48. This issue is resolved. <br />49. This issue is resolved. <br />50. This issue is resolved. <br />51. A major concern in reviewing the proposed western mine plan area with regard to <br />potential groundwater impacts is that none of the monitoring wells associated with the <br />Bowie No. 1 mine plan area have been incorporated into the Hydrologic Monitoring <br />Plan for the new expanded Bowie No. 2 permit area as described on page 2.05-117. <br />The proposed plan includes monitoring wells located at the Terror Creek mains and <br />one proposed well down gradient from a portion of the proposed new disturbance. <br />There are essentially no wells included in the hydrologic monitoring plan that would be <br />either directly up gradient or down gradient from the new disturbance associated with <br />the western mine plan proposal. There appears to be numerous inactive wells from <br />the Bowie No. 1 permit area that would be suitable monitoring wells for the new <br />western mine plan area. In addition, several surface water and groundwater <br />monitoring sites are listed in Tables 1, 3 and 4B in Volume 4 of the Bowie No. 1 Mine <br />permit application along with the footnote that monitoring would be reactivated if <br />mining occurred in the east part of the Bowie No. 1 Mine. Please address this and <br />modify the Hydrologic Monitoring Plan accordingly. <br />BRL has not provided an adequate response. There are still no wells included in the <br />hydrologic monitoring plan that would be used to assess groundwater impacts <br />associated with the West Mine Expansion. BRL must first provide adequate baseline <br />groundwater data which include the monitoring well identification and completion <br />information and seasonal quantity and quality data. Secondly, BRL shall identify <br />existing wells or if necessary propose new monitoring wells to be included in the <br />hydrologic monitoring plan. The monitoring plan should be designed to assess <br />potential impacts to the hydrologic balance down gradient from the area proposed for <br />new disturbance with the expansion project. These wells shall be incorporated into <br />the approved monitoring plan and the operator shall continue to monitor groundwater <br />quality and quantity throughout the liability period in accordance with the approved <br />plan. <br />In BRL's response five potential monitoring wells are identified but none are <br />appropriately constructed to monitor the B-Seam or the saturated zone above the 13- <br />Seam. Only one of these wells can be located on Map 9 Hydrological Monitoring <br />Location Map. Please revise the application materials and revise the Hydrologic
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.