My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2010-07-12_REVISION - C1996083 (2)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Coal
>
C1996083
>
2010-07-12_REVISION - C1996083 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 4:15:39 PM
Creation date
7/12/2010 10:20:22 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1996083
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
7/12/2010
Doc Name
Adequacy Response No. 2
From
J.E. Stover & Associates, Inc
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
PR12
Email Name
JJD
SB1
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
J J Dudash -6- July 8, 2010 <br />Section 2.05.3 Operation Plan <br />34.This issue is resolved. <br />35.This issue is resolved. <br />36. In the last paragraph on revised page 2.05-48, please explain why the statement is <br />made that drill hole BRL-1-03-01 might also be known as BRL-04-01. <br />BRL responded that this statement was deleted. However, the June 1, 2010 <br />submittal did not contain a revised page 2.05-48. Please submit this revised page. <br />BRL - Enclosed is revised page 2.05-48. <br />37. This issue is resolved. <br />Section 2.05.5 Postmining Land Uses <br />38. This issue is resolved. <br />39. This issue is resolved. <br />40. In the last paragraph on revised page 2.05-85, please update the first sentence to <br />show that other landowners are involved. <br />In the June 1, 2010 submittal, BRL stated that the text was revised. However, the <br />copy of page 2.05-85 that was submitted does not show this change. Please <br />provide a revised page 2.05-85. <br />BRL - The second sentence in the last paragraph on page 2.05-85 brought in the <br />USDA-FS and BLM as additional landowners who consider the postmining land use. <br />41. As was brought up in Section 2.04.3 above, in the second sentence of the last <br />paragraph on revised page 2.05-85, please update, if appropriate, the statement <br />that Delta County does not have any land use regulations. There is an example of <br />county approval in the middle of revised page 2.05-87. <br />Page 2.05-85 was revised in the June 1, 2010 submittal to show that Delta County <br />has specific development regulations but not for postmining land uses. BRL was <br />notified by Delta County that a county review of PR-12 was not needed. As an <br />additional question, however, the county approval mentioned on page 2.05-87 <br />references pages 2.05-60iii through 60vi. These four pages appear in the approved <br />permit application but do not appear in the revised text submitted in the original PR- <br />12 application. Please explain. <br />BRL - The county approval mentioned on page 2.05-87 was moved to pages 2.05- <br />90 through 93. The reference was changed on amended page 2.05-87.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.