Laserfiche WebLink
requests that Section 2.05.6(6)(b)(iii) on revised page 2.05-143 be revised to reflect this change. The <br />Division also requests that a statement be made in this same section that, should mining be proposed <br />within one mile of the Bruce Park Dam and Terror Creek Reservoir, the subsidence control plan will <br />be reactivated. The same reference should also be added to the appropriate sections of 2.05.6(6) <br />which now discuss the subsidence control plan, rather than deleting such text. If BRL wants to <br />continue monitoring of the Bruce Park Dam and the Terror Creek Reservoir on a voluntary basis, an <br />appropriate explanation should be placed into the text as well, such as on revised page 2.05-158. <br />This issue is resolved. The requested revisions were made on revised pages 2.05-43 and 2.05-44 in the <br />June 1, 2010 submittal. <br />Section 2.10 Maps and Plans <br />64. Please revise the currently approved Maps 11, 14 and 27-B to show that the new permit boundary <br />extends to the west. <br />This issue is resolved. The three maps were revised in the June 1, 2010 submittal. <br />Section 3.02.2 Determination of Bond Amount <br />65. Attached is the Division's reclamation cost estimate for PR-12. The estimate is comprised of eight <br />tasks (a summary sheet and tasks 251-257) and represents an increase in liability of $45,039.00. This <br />estimate included the transfer of three exploration holes (BRL-1-03-01, BRL-1-08-01 and BRL-1-08- <br />04), drill pads, light use roads, topsoil replacement and reseeding from the Bowie No. 1 Mine permit <br />into the Bowie No. 2 Mine permit. The original Bowie No. I Mine revisions were TR-41 and TR-49. <br />The Division's estimate is more than the one submitted by BRL because the Division updated the costs <br />for the tasks from TR-41 and TR-49 in the PR-12 estimate. Please inform the Division in writing <br />whether or not this estimate is acceptable to BRL. <br />This issue is resolved. In the June 1, 2010 submittal, BRL accepted the reclamation cost estimate. <br />Section 4.20 Subsidence Control <br />66. Under Rule 4.20.2, please provide documentation that owners of property, including structures, and <br />residents within the area above the underground workings and adjacent areas have received the <br />mining schedule as described in Rules 4.20.2(1), (2) and (3). <br />Response not accepted. The Pitkin Mesa pipeline is "property" and will be subsided with a worst case <br />consequence of separation and/or disruption of the delivery of water. The owner of this structure <br />requires notification in exact accordance with Rule 4.20.2. Please review Rule 4.20.2 and submit <br />evidence that the owners of property have been properly notified with at least the minimal information <br />as required by the Rule. <br />General Comments Re arding Maps <br />67. Map 07 - Geology <br />13