My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2010-06-08_INSPECTION - M1977424
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Inspection
>
Minerals
>
M1977424
>
2010-06-08_INSPECTION - M1977424
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 4:12:53 PM
Creation date
6/15/2010 9:30:57 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1977424
IBM Index Class Name
INSPECTION
Doc Date
6/8/2010
Doc Name
Response to inspection report
From
Western Water & Land, Inc.
To
DRMS
Inspection Date
3/18/2010
Email Name
THM
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Page 2 <br />June 4, 2010 <br />transducer installed in the vault. WWL reported the results of monitoring observations to the <br />DRMS, BLM and CDPHE via email. The record of these email transmissions is provided in <br />Attachment A. <br />The weekly inspections of the pond detection system and electronic pressure transducer data from the <br />detection vault showed that flow into the vault from the detection system pipes ceased on February 19'h, <br />2010. It is estimated that a total of 8,000 gallons of water was pumped from the vault into the pond. <br />As stated in the notification letter, the key corrective action proposed by WWL was to conduct a <br />thorough inspection of the liner. Because flow into the vault ceased, it was suspected that the liner leak <br />was near or on the slope of the liner and that such a leak would have introduced a transient volume of <br />water to the leak collection system during the 2009 high water period for the pond. The fact that water <br />was no longer entering the vault indicated that water at current levels, which inundated approximately <br />95 percent of the bottom of the pond with 6 to 12 inches of water, was not contributing to leakage <br />through the liner. <br />As outlined by WWL in the notification letter, WWL conducted several inspections of the liner slope <br />and portions of the pond bottom prior to liner repairs. Each survey was progressively more thorough <br />than the previous survey and all observed holes or cracks were marked for repair. The surveys resulted <br />in the delineation of 6 holes or cracks in the lower portion of the liner slope. One such hole was a two- <br />inch cut that appeared adjacent to a liner joint weld in the northeast corner of the pond. This corner is <br />slightly elevated and was above the water line at the time of the survey, but the corner would normally <br />be submerged during high water periods (spring runoff and high rainfall in August). Three holes in the <br />liner were apparently due to impact events of an unknown origin that caused very small (less thanY2- <br />inch long) puncture-like openings. The other two cracks located at low-elevations on the liner were due <br />to old welds that had broken open near the gauging station and spillway. Virtually all other cracks were <br />well above the normal high water line and were associated with former old welds that had reopened; <br />some of these were near the anchored portion of the liner. <br />All observed holes or cracks were repaired by a professional liner repair contractor, H&H <br />Environmental, Inc., on April 14, 2010. During the repair work, the liner contractor specifically <br />mentioned that the liner was in good condition. <br />The DRMS Inspection Report states that the required corrective action is "to replace the HDPE liner <br />within 180 days of this inspection report, which is September 28, 2010." The report also states that <br />"Other options that will minimize disturbance to the hydrologic balance will also be considered by <br />DRMS." <br />OOSI recognizes that the existing HDPE pond liner, installed in 1984, is beyond its typical life <br />expectancy of 20 years. As you are aware, OOSI submitted Amendment No. 1- Water Transmission <br />Pipeline and Evaporation Pond, in August 2006, and DRMS approved OOSI's request for a 10-year <br />extension of the reclamation period beginning August 5, 2008. It is our understanding that it is the <br />preferred goal of DRMS that OOSI reclaim the Evaporation Pond and that manage the retort water <br />discharge by other methods. OOSI is currently monitoring the quality of the retort water that discharges <br />into the Evaporation Pond, and investigating other means to treat or manage the retort water discharge. <br />Constituents that are particularly problematic are the relatively non-reactive elements of boron, <br />potassium, sodium, and the compound of sulfate. <br />As an alternative to replacing the HDPE liner at this time, OOSI proposes to continue monitoring of the <br />Evaporation Pond leak detection system and the liner repairs made in April. If the hypothesis of a liner <br />leak being located at the toe of the liner is correct and the liner repairs are successful, no further leakage <br />TMarshaII052410.doc
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.