Laserfiche WebLink
Page 2.04 3 -8 "The majority of soils on the Morgan Property in the permit area are prime <br />farmland soils as determined by the MRCS in 2008. We are not going to keep going through. this. <br />First off the ACTUAL Prime Farmland soils were determined as prime farmland soils by DEAN <br />Stindt inl992 when he stated that BARX soils are prime farmland soils and with an adequate <br />and dependable water supply they could be classified as prime farmland. They were disqualified <br />for the small acreage that he was examining on the EASTERN Part of 2700 road and. South of <br />BB Road on a very small area just down from the office. HOWEVER, even in his letter he stated <br />BARX soils were prime farmland soils. There were numerous soil samples done within the <br />permit area in 1,988, 1996, and 1998 which one was done by Jima Irvine and was a Class i soil <br />survey- Mel. Staats sued WPC. As a result of the lawsuit, Lance and Ross both stated that there <br />would never be another drop of PRIME FARMLAND within the permit area. They then started <br />using anything and everything they could do to disqualify Prime Soils. 2.04.12. If there is a <br />chance that there MAY BE Prime farmland the applicant must contact the US Soil Conservation <br />service before the application is submitted. If at that time, the applicant can prove there is no <br />prime farmland, then and only then can they get a negative determination from the Division. If <br />PRIME SOILS ARE INDICATED which BARX had already been designated as a PRME SOIL, <br />then further investigation is required not only by the APPLICANT, but by the STATE. AND <br />ONLY WITH ABSOLUTE PROOF, ABSOLUTE PROOF CAN A NEGATIVE <br />DETERMINATION BE MADE! ! ! ! ! In 1988, prime SOILS were recognized. In 1992, PRIME <br />soils were recognized, and in the Class 1 Soil. Survey done by Jim Irvine in 1998, it was <br />conclusive that not only was there PRIME SOILS< but there was Alluvials and lots of PRIME <br />FARMLAND within the permit areas. BEFORE ANY APPLICATION IS APPROVED! <br />What this is saying Mr Berry is that BARX DARVEY soils had been identified. as being prime <br />SOILS FROM day one, 1.988 AND 1.992. Now, Barx soils were known to be PRIME long <br />before 1998 and WFC also had a soil survey from 1996 and 1988 that showed BARX soils on <br />our property, so there was NO REASON THAT A FULL INVESTIGATION BY THE STATE <br />AS WELL AS NRCS AND WFC SHOULD HAVE BEEN CONDUCTED AT THAT TIME. <br />EVERYONE KNEW BY 1998 EVEN THE STATE BECAUSE IT IS ALL AT THE COURT <br />HOUSE WHICH ALL OF YOU HAVE A COPY OF. AND WFC KNEW THAT WE HAD <br />BARX SOILS AND THEY KNEW THAT MR MORGAN WAS THE ,LARGEST SHARE <br />HOLDER AND AS THEY SIGNED THE LEASE THEY KNEW IT WAS ALL IN CROP <br />LAND!!!! <br />Now again, we would all like to know how they got their permit renewed and why hasn't the <br />STATE put a total end to all of these lies and distortion of facts and until they have a complete <br />and accurate plan to be on this prime farmland property, why are they still being allowed to mine <br />this or any of it because there is other prime soils and Alluvial.s ?7 ?? How are you approving <br />their applications and how are you even allowing such a ridiculous permit .revision ? ?? <br />Page 2.04 3 -10 "Prime farmland soils as determined by NRCS in 2008" Again a .lie. Prime <br />Farmaland SOILS were determined in 1988 as well as 1992 and 1998. PRIME FARMLAND <br />SOILS WERE DETERMINED AS EARLY AS 1988. BARX WAS NAMED AS A PRIME <br />FARMLAND SOIL. <br />