Laserfiche WebLink
The fields West had also been, planted ed to alfalfa�We�imers felt Morgans <br />that was on ofthe best orn fiels <br />property in 199912000, were return <br />they had ever seen, in the state. <br />Page 2.04 3 -9 "The acres of irrigated Pasture on the Morgan Property n ot historically managed D as <br />such. The Western and Eastern portions of the Morgan property were <br />well, enough to be considered as irrigated cropland. Violation o f all rules and regulation and <br />adding terminology again. The western . field was not irrigated by the way of a side roll until after <br />Western Fuels and Morgans agreed to Lease at which point the Morgans began better irrigation. " <br />Worn Mr. Berry. What a very stupid statement and what kind of idiots write this stuff? All of <br />the Morgan Property will be labeled Irrigated cropland as it was prior to the mine entering the <br />property. The lease states this. NRCS states this and we are saying it again. The Morgan <br />property was historically irrigated and cropped for 50 years. We raised NO livestock from 1985 <br />on and our top priority was production. Cropland is ANYTHING that was harvested and <br />management or irrigation has NOTHING to do with cropland. There are 109s of D RYLA D <br />farmers that raise some of the best hay, oats, beans, sunflowers, potatoes, trees, whe <br />numerous other. CROPS with historically <br />C � used <br />land has NO management asps I <br />k of it definition nor <br />keep adding definitions to definitions. p <br />does it have the word irrigation. as part of its definition and where were these idiots at when only <br />the success of the crops Paid the bills and the amount we earned ?? They need to find a new <br />manager to manage them! How much slander are we suppose to take before they just write a <br />pex it te'vision as required by law without all of the bullshit <br />There was NO si.deroll at the time the lease was signed because the field had been in CORN and <br />you cannot raise corn. UNDER A SIDEROLL. IDIOTS! <br />Page 2.04 3 -9 Ward Burbridge used to own San Miguel Power property and it was irrigated and <br />cropped with Ward Burbridges water. San Miguel. Power bought it from Ward Burbridge and <br />Morgans leased it from San Miguel Power and Used MORGANS water to irrigate it. It was also <br />irrigated and cropped. IT WAS NEVER DRYLAND AS STATED kIEKE. <br />"Although San Miguel Power does not have ditch rights, they are supplied water by WFC from <br />CALAMITY DRAW. What liars! This is a flat out lie. Calamity is not even plumbed to the san <br />miguel power property except for maybe a little less than a quarter of it. They are liars. They use <br />Bud Bensons water without his permission as well as Garveys and Burbridges and they want you <br />to believe that this water comes out of the draw to irrigate all of this property. IT DOES NOT! <br />The documentation of the letter of 1992 written by Dean Stindt and used by WFC continuously <br />as well as by the STATE to disqualify any of the Barx soils because it did not have a dependable <br />and. ADEQUATEwater supply. The reason Dean Stindt disqualified the piece of Barx Soils on <br />the Staat place is because the water came out of Calamity and Dean felt at that time by talking <br />with the irrigator that this piece was not Prime soils on that piece of property because it was <br />Calamity Draw and the dependable and adequate WATER SUPPLY WAS DESIGNATED AS <br />THE CC DITCH AND SINCE T14ERE WERE NO SHARES TO T14AT PIECE, HE <br />DISQUALIFIED IT. It'S funny how they can tape one thing and use it for their benefit and on <br />the next page take that same information and totally contradict themselves. <br />