My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2010-06-07_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981008
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
General Documents
>
Coal
>
C1981008
>
2010-06-07_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981008
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 4:12:50 PM
Creation date
6/11/2010 3:01:10 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981008
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
6/7/2010
Doc Name
Faxed Letter from JoEllen (Sample Soil Survey, Barx Identified, Dean Stindts Letters)
From
JoEllen Turner
To
DRMS
Permit Index Doc Type
General Correspondence
Email Name
DAB
SB1
MLT
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
26
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mr. David Berry <br />131.3 Sherman Street, Room 215 <br />Denver, Colorado 80203 <br />June 4, 2010 <br />RE: Permit Revision #6 <br />t�> -Y, 11 , 1, � <br />2o t <br />a4 � <br />Dear Mr. Berry: We are requesting again that this type of permit revision be withdrawn because <br />of all the false documentation that it contains. It would be much more simple to just re-write a <br />factual document covering only the issues needed to get a proper . permit- revision that it is to re- <br />do this existing one. Maps are wt*n& information in index is wrong, facts are wrong, misuse of <br />laws, rules, and regulations and a total disregard for the farmer. <br />Page 2.03.4 "General caretaking activities but no mining or other disturbances" What about the <br />CC ditch when all the pipe and re- routing goes in? <br />"New Horizon I is not addressed in this permit renewal" It's not a RENEWAL, it's a <br />REVISION. <br />Page 2.03.1 I #9 Dirk Richardson. This is wrong, it should be Dirk Richards <br />#44 patty Morgan has not been mined. nor is she going to be mined. <br />Page 2.03 -28 "no Alluvial valley floors" 'There are several Alluvial Valley Floors within the <br />permit area and is documented as such. <br />2.03 -30 How did they get this permit renewal to 2013? The have broken numerous laws and <br />violated rules and regulations, how did they get this permit renewal #5 approved when we <br />objected in 2007 to it and when we have Never received a copy of it. And How did they get by <br />with putting 'NOT APPLICABLE" when. asked if there was any prime farmland? <br />2.04.3 -6 what abandoned cropland? What abandoned irrigated cropland? What abandoned <br />irrigated Farmland? <br />"improvements are generally limited to land leveling." WHAT A, LIE. Another cut to the <br />farmer. They don't even know how hard we work . to get these farms in the conditions that they <br />were before the mine entered the properties. Constant rock picking, constant fertilizing, constant <br />leveling and, cultipacking, rotations, constant removing weeds and unwanted growths, even <br />pastures require hours of maintenance. Constmtly fighting rodents and weevils and evcything. <br />"Induced wheat grasses" What induced wheat grasses which are actually a part of dryland mixes. <br />Not irrigated pastures and haylands <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.