My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2010-05-07_PERMIT FILE - C2009087A (28)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Coal
>
C2009087A
>
2010-05-07_PERMIT FILE - C2009087A (28)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 4:11:41 PM
Creation date
6/3/2010 10:38:11 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C2009087A
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
5/7/2010
Doc Name
DRAINAGE AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN
Section_Exhibit Name
Exhibit 2.05.3-E2 Drainage and Sediment Control Plan
Media Type
D
Archive
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
29
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Peabody Sage Creek Mine — Drainage and Sediment Control Plan <br />2.2 Sedimentation Calculations <br />The SEDCAD4 model calculates storm event sediment yield using the Revised Universal Soil Loss <br />Equation (RUSLE). Input parameters used in the sedimentation analysis are described in the <br />following sections. <br />2.2.1 Rainfall Factor <br />The Rainfall Factor, or Rainfall Erosivity Index, (R) is a measurement of the amount of erosion <br />caused by the rainfall event. It is directly proportional to the total storm energy times the maximum <br />30- minute intensity. Historically, Seneca Coal Company (SCC) used an R- factor of 30 for <br />sedimentology evaluations at its Seneca II, Yoast and II-W operations — this value is suitable for <br />bare or disturbed lands that are easily eroded. Consequently, the design evaluations for Pond 002, <br />as well as, the South Surface Facilities and Portal Area sumps used an R- factor value of 30. <br />A postmine landscape held, or approved, for bond release is characterized as being well- vegetated <br />and generates significantly less erosion than disturbed lands. Consequently, the postmine <br />demonstrations utilized an R- factor of 10, which is representative of conditions in northwest <br />Colorado (Renard, et al, 1997). <br />2.2.2 Soil Erodibility Factor <br />The soil erodibility factors (K) are based on historic soil survey information taken from Tab 9, Soil <br />• Baseline Study, of the Seneca II Mine permit (Nyenhuis, 1994). The undisturbed lands modeled in <br />the Pond 002 demonstration utilized an area- weighted value. Consequently, the K values for the <br />undisturbed area are an average representative of numerous soil series characteristics. The <br />following table presents the K factor values used for the sedimentology demonstrations. <br />TABLE 2.05.3 -E2 -2 <br />Soil Erodibility Factor Values <br />Soil Characteristic <br />Hydrologic Soil Group <br />Soil Erodibility Factor <br />k <br />Undisturbed <br />B <br />0.19 <br />Topsoil Stripped <br />C <br />0.29 <br />Parkin Lot/Facilities Area <br />D <br />0.36 <br />Reclaimed <br />B <br />0.24 <br />2.2.3 Length -Slope Factor <br />Input parameters to determine the length -slope (LS) factor were measured from the drainage and <br />sediment control plan maps. The measurements are included in the SEDCAD4 design <br />demonstrations. <br />2.2.4 Control Factor <br />The control factor (C) is used to account for vegetative or mulch cover. The values utilized are <br />• shown on Table 2.05.3 -E2 -3. They were adapted from Renard et al (1997), as present in Warner et <br />2.05.3 -E2.8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.