My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2010-05-19_REVISION - M1999069 (5)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1999069
>
2010-05-19_REVISION - M1999069 (5)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/16/2021 5:27:05 PM
Creation date
5/20/2010 1:26:49 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1999069
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
5/19/2010
Doc Name
Acreage Release Request
From
Applegate Group, Inc.
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
AR4
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mr. Eric Scott <br />Division of Reclamation; Mining, and Safety <br />. <br />May 18_2010 <br />Page 3 of 4 _ <br />• The operator has complied with. applicable federal. and Colorado water quality laws `and <br />regulations, including statewide water .quality standards and site-specific classi-fications <br />and standards adopted by the Water Quality Control Commission. ; <br />• The operator has complied with all applicable -federal. and -Colorado dredge and fill <br />requirements. . <br />• No temporary or permanent siltation structures were constructed. <br />• No dams were constructed in. conjunction with this permit. <br />• All surface areas of the affected landwere stabilized to control erosion. <br />3.1.7 Groundwater <br />The operator has complied with applicable groundwater quality standards in effect during mining <br />operations and-reclamation activities at the site. <br />3.1.8 Wildlife <br />The area mined. was not, considered .prime wildlife habitat, however, all aspects of mining and <br />reclamation took into account the safety and protection.of wildlife.,. <br />• Mining and reclamation activities did not disturb existing wildlife species that require <br />special consideration on or near-the site. <br />• Wildlife habitat creation was not a part of the reclamation plan. <br />3.1.9 Topsoiling. , - <br />Topsoil was removed and segregated from other spoil material during the mining operation.: The <br />topsoil was removed, stockpiled for a short period of time, and then replaced evenly over backfill <br />material during the concurrent reclamation activities. <br />• Since reclamation was performed -concurrent with mining operations, topsoil . was <br />replaced in a short enough time period to avoid deterioration. <br />• Woody vegetation was not present within the affected areas prior to excavation. <br />• ` Stockpiles were stored and configured to, minimize erosion. <br />• , 'Stockpiles were rehandled as little as possible prior to replacement on disturbed- areas. <br />• Measures necessary to assure the stability of the replaced topsoil .were taken. <br />• Other materials more suitable for vegetation growth were not required. <br />• Topsoil was placed on the affected areas in as even a manner as possible. <br />• Vegetative piles were not created during reining operations or reclamation activities. <br />3.1.10 Revegetation <br />The property was revegetated in-Fall 2005. The property owner chose to revegetate with pasture <br />grasses to establish a final land use of pastureland, and has provided a sprinkler system to ensure <br />the grasses will be well established. The. property has been graded so that all slopes can be <br />traversed by livestock and accessed by farm machinery. -
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.