My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2010-05-14_REVISION - C1980007 (7)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Coal
>
C1980007
>
2010-05-14_REVISION - C1980007 (7)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 4:12:02 PM
Creation date
5/17/2010 8:29:01 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980007
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
5/14/2010
Doc Name
Incompleteness Responses
From
Mountain Coal Company
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
TR121
Email Name
TAK
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Limited-Results Archaeological Survey Form (Page 5 of 10) <br />VI. STATEMENT OF OBJECTIVES <br />27. Objectives: The primary objective of the archaeological survey was to identify any significant cultural <br />resources that would be impacted by the construction of the drill pads and access roads. To achieve this objective, it <br />was necessary to conduct a site file search to identify previously recorded cultural resources and to conduct a <br />pedestrian inspection of the project area to detect hitherto unrecorded cultural resources. The criteria employed to <br />assess the significance of recorded cultural resources were those published by the US Government Code of Federal <br />Regulations (36CFR 60) for determining site eligibility to the National Register of Historic Places. These read as <br />follows: <br />National Register criteria for evaluation. The quality of significance in American history, architecture, <br />archeology, engineering, and culture is present in districts, sites, buildings, structures, and objects that possess <br />integrity of location, design, setting, materials, workmanship, feeling, and association and <br />(a) that are associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of our <br />history; or <br />(b) that are associated with the lives of persons significant in our past; or <br />(c) that embody the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, or method of construction, or that <br />represent the work of a master, or that possess high artistic values, or that represent a significant and <br />distinguishable entity whose components may lack individual distinction; or <br />(d) that has yielded, or may be likely to yield, information important in prehistory or history. <br />Another objective of the inventory was to relocate a historic road and trail. identified through GLO data. <br />VII. FIELD METHODS <br />28. Definitions: <br />Site: Sites were defined for this project as locales at which there were sufficient artifacts (usually five or <br />more) or cultural features and which represented patterned human activity. Furthermore, the artifacts had <br />to be localized in a given situation and had to evidence at least 50 years antiquity. <br />IF: Cultural items older than 50 years not meeting the criteria for designation as a site were considered <br />isolated finds. <br />29. Describe Survey Method: The center of each circular drill pad parcel was marked with a nail and a pink pin <br />flag. Pink flagging tape was tied to trees surrounding the nail in order to increase the visibility of the center <br />point location. Two sizes of drill pads were defined, having diameters of 450 ft (137 m) and 600 ft (183 m) and <br />encompassing areas of 3.52 and 6.51 acres, respectively. If accessible, each survey area was examined by means <br />of pedestrian transects spaced no more than 15 in apart. In cases where dense vegetative cover restricted <br />pedestrian movement and few areas with visible ground were present, a less systematic approach was adopted, <br />consisting of the careful examination of each individual opening in the brush where the ground could be seen. <br />Access roads were inventoried within 200 ft (61 m) wide corridors centered on the orange-flagged centerlines. <br />The roads were inventoried by means of parallel pedestrian transects spaced 15 in apart. Like the drill pad <br />parcels, if pedestrian movement was restricted by dense brush, only the more open areas within the road <br />corridors were examined, using less systematic methods. Road and drainage cuts in the survey areas were <br />examined wherever possible. In many cases, parcels and proposed access road routes were located entirely on <br />slopes exceeding 30%, or which were inaccessible due to dense brush, or where both conditions obtained. These <br />areas were assessed visually from vantage points that allowed good visibility of the entire parcel or road <br />location. In this manner, survey areas on steep slopes or within dense forest or brush where pedestrian <br />examination was not feasible were eliminated from the inventory. Employing the methods described above, 62 <br />out of the 87 drill pads and 3.53 miles out of the 6 miles of access road corridors were examined for cultural <br />resources to one degree or another, as indicated on the attached maps (Figures 2 and 3).
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.