My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2010-04-20_REVISION - M2000158
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M2000158
>
2010-04-20_REVISION - M2000158
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/15/2021 3:06:08 PM
Creation date
4/21/2010 7:23:27 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2000158
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
4/20/2010
Doc Name
Adequacy Review #1
From
DRMS
To
Civil Resources, LLC
Type & Sequence
AM2
Email Name
JLE
AJW
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
where mining will occur. Does the applicant have agreements with the owners of these <br />gas lines and equipment to be relocated? If not, the Operator will need to obtain these <br />agreements or update the mining and reclamation plan to leave these structures in <br />place prior to the approval of the amendment. Or the applicant can commit to not <br />affecting land within 200 feet of the structure until such an agreement was made. <br />41.) The applicant submitted an agreement with the Western Mutual Ditch Company in <br />the amendment application. The Division has on file an agreement between the <br />applicant and Xcel energy for road crossings. However no other structure damage <br />reimbursement agreements have been submitted to the Division. For the current <br />mining plan, the operator has defined setbacks they were to maintain from the mine <br />perimeter and structures. Please identify what structures are located on or within 200 <br />feet of the new permit area. For these structures, the operator must: <br />a.) Provide a notarized agreement between the applicant and the person(s) having <br />an interest in the structure, that the applicant is to provide compensation for any <br />damage to the structure; or <br />b.) Where such an agreement cannot be reached, the applicant shall provide an <br />appropriate engineering evaluation that demonstrates that such structure shall not <br />be damaged by activities occurring at the mining operation. <br />c.) Where such structure is a utility, the Applicant may supply a notarized letter, on <br />utility letterhead, from the owner(s) of the utility that the mining and reclamation <br />activities, as proposed will have "no negative effect" on their utility. <br />Please provide evidence (certified letter to structure owners) that a notarized agreement <br />between the structure owners and the applicant was pursued. If these agreements cannot <br />be reached, please submit engineering evaluations for the identified structures. <br />Other Issues: <br />42.) Enclosed with this review is correspondence from the Colorado Division of Water <br />Resources, the Army Corp of Engineers, and the Office of Archaeology and Historic <br />Preservation in regards to this amendment application. Please address their concerns. <br />Publication and Notices <br />43.) In accordance with Rule 1.6.2 (d) & (e) and Rule 1.6.5, within ten (10) days after the <br />application was deemed complete and submitted, you must have published a notice in <br />a newspaper of general circulation in the locality of the proposed mining operation once <br />a week for four (4) consecutive weeks. Also, immediately after the first publication you <br />were to mail a copy of the notice to all owners of record of surface and mineral rights <br />holders of any recorded easements and all owners of record of lands that are within 200
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.