My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2010-04-06_INSPECTION - M1986061
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Inspection
>
Minerals
>
M1986061
>
2010-04-06_INSPECTION - M1986061
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 4:03:25 PM
Creation date
4/15/2010 10:06:47 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1986061
IBM Index Class Name
INSPECTION
Doc Date
4/6/2010
Doc Name
Inspection report
From
DRMS
To
Four Corners Materials, Inc.
Inspection Date
3/22/2010
Email Name
RCO
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
26
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
(Page 2) <br />MINE ID # OR PROSPECTING ID # M-1986-061 <br />INSPECTION DATE 3/22/10 INSPECTOR'S INITIALS RCO <br />OBSERVATIONS <br />This was a pre-operation inspection of the areas proposed by the operator to be added to the permit under Amendment <br />AM-2, as well as a monitoring inspection of the existing 112c permitted area, performed by the Division. The operator <br />was contacted about the scheduled inspection. The operator's representative named on page one was present during the <br />inspection. Except for loading stockpiled material and hauling away by trucks, the site was not active during this <br />inspection. <br />The permit boundary ID sign was observed at the entrance to the site. Most of the permit boundaries run along existing <br />fencelines, and it was observed that existing disturbances are within the boundaries. After the amendment is approved <br />the operator must ensure that new boundaries of the expanded affected area, are adequately marked. Corner markers <br />should be made more visible, and please ensure that they are durable. <br />The bond is adequate at this time, but it will be completely recalculated as part of this amendment. No new figures are <br />included with this report, since the amendment review is not completed. <br />The northern part of the permitted area, Mining Area 1, has been almost fully mined. It will be expanded to the west, into <br />an additional area called Mining Area 3. The highwall along the west sideof this mining area is vertical through a 25-ft <br />section of aggregate, and the 10 ft of overburden has been sloped at about 2:1. The operator proposes to continue this <br />type of highwall across the amended areas also. The pit floor in this area contains 2 large stockpiles of overburden and a <br />topsoil pile. There is also a large topsoil pile above the western highwall. Highwall reduction, at the conclusion of mining <br />in this northern area, will include backfilling deep fills of overburden to attain a surface of 1-:1 gradient, then topsoil and <br />revegetation to irrigated pasture. <br />The asphalt plant remains set up where it has been for a few years, in the southern part of Mining Area 1. It is clean and <br />orderly, and all fluids are adequately stored with impermeable secondary containment. Not far south of the plant is a <br />small area where the landowner stores his agricultural equipment (this was approved under a past revision). This pit floor <br />elevation will not be mined down further. All earthmoving and processing equipment as well as agricultural equipment will <br />eventually be removed so that the area can be reclaimed. <br />The pit floor is fairly level. Recent snow melt has produced a muddy floor with a few areas of ponded water. A perimeter <br />berm along the east side helps contain this water on the pad. However, there is one location along the eastern edge of <br />the pad (pit floor) of Mining Area 1, where ponded stormwater has breached the containment berm and washed soil and <br />rock down the slope. There is a buried culvert in this area whose inlet sits well above the height of the water level of the <br />puddle (estimated surface is 20 ft x 100 ft). The location of the wash out is where the pad was extended sometime in the <br />past by filling the gulch. Whether the failure was due to poorly compacted fill material or another reason, it was <br />incompetent and failed when it was saturated and weighted by impounded water.. Removal of the buttressing material by <br />gullying and/or deep wetting from spring snowmelt has also created several stress cracks along the edge of the pad, <br />indicating further instability. Damage has occurred, and more damage appears possible. All eroded materials were <br />transported a short distance down the slope, but appeared to be retained near the toe of the slope,, within the permitted <br />area and above the confluence with Cottonwood Creek. This situation is noted as a problem on page one, under the <br />topics of "erosion/sedimentation" and "stormwater management plan." The corrective action is that the operator must <br />develop and implement a prompt and long term remedy to this unstable feature, and report such to this office. Please see <br />the last page for the correction date. <br />At the toe of the entrance ramp road is the water fill station. This station will remain in this location during future phases of <br />mining. Farther south in Mining Area 2 are several gas well features that are well-marked and protected. Mining Area 4 <br />will be added to the west of these structures, and pit expansion activity will include avoiding the gas well structures but <br />rerouting a section of buried pipeline, under agreement with the well owner. <br />In Mining Area 2, there is a grass-lined channel with culverted crossings for mining equipment, near Valley Fill #1 (which <br />has been fully backfilled and is now used as stockpile area). A second large gulch, in the south end of Mining Area 2, will <br />be similarly filled up to the future grade of the pit floor, and will be designated Valley Fill #2 and will include its own grass- <br />lined channel. The south end of the current active mining in this area consists of another steep highwall, stormwater <br />retention pond, pitrun and overburden stockpiles. Mining has extended southward nearly to the gulch that will be <br />backfilled. It appears that some of the overburden that was stripped and placed along the top of the gulch slope has
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.