My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2010-12-17_REVISION - C1981019 (94)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Coal
>
C1981019
>
2010-12-17_REVISION - C1981019 (94)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 4:28:07 PM
Creation date
3/30/2010 10:14:59 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981019
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
12/17/2010
Doc Name
Exhibit 23 Item 1 Geotechnical Report -Collom Temporary Spoil Pile & Pond
Type & Sequence
PR3
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
128
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
SHANNON 6WILSON, INC. <br />We performed pseudo- static analysis assuming bedrock dip of 3 and 5 and computed a minimum <br />FS of 1.4. This exceeds the regulatory minimum for seismic analysis of FS 1.3. <br />8.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS <br />The results of our stability analysis as described above indicate that temporary spoil valley fill <br />constructed with the geometries shown in Figures 2 and 5 has calculated long term Factors of <br />Safety in of 1.5 or greater as required by CMLRB Regulations (2005). Our stability analysis was <br />performed to evaluate long -term conditions in accordance with the requirements of the <br />regulations. The recommendations discussed below, primarily related to the underdrain and <br />surface water control on the fill faces, also consider the temporary nature of the fill and the <br />limited consequences should a slope failure occur. <br />Short-term stability conditions during fill placement will vary depending on the location within <br />the fill. We made assumptions regarding the sequence of construction and bedrock dip in the <br />area which should be confirmed prior to construction of the fill. The following paragraphs <br />provide our design and construction recommendations to address these issues. <br />8.1 Spoil Fill Placement <br />1 0 We recommend that the fill be placed in approximately horizontal lifts. To maintain <br />comparatively high permeability within the fill, the use of thick lifts is desirable. It is our <br />opinion that lifts on the order of 50 to 100 feet can be used because of the insensitivity of the <br />spoil site to post - construction settlement. Previous experience with the Streeter, Section 16 and <br />West Pit Fills has shown that fills intended for open rangeland following construction perform <br />satisfactorily with thick lifts. <br />Performance of the temporary spoil fill is dependent on following the recommendations <br />presented in this report and good construction practice. We recommend observation of the fill <br />placement be performed quarterly as required by CMLRB Regulations to observe and document <br />stripping, drain construction, fill placement, and surface drainage conditions. <br />8.2 Spoil Fill Underdrain <br />We recommended the drain location begin at the highest elevation spring location below the fill <br />and extend downstream, exiting at the northern toe of the fill (Figure 4). The drain size and <br />materials should be in accordance with the regulations. Lateral drains should be constructed in <br />locations where seeps or springs are mapped (or discovered during stripping), and should tie into <br />23 -1- 01101 -400 -R I .docx/wp /Ikn 23 -1- 01101 -400 <br />12 <br />Exh. 23 -1 -19 Revision Date: 08/05/09 <br />Revision No.: PR -03 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.