Laserfiche WebLink
SHANNON &WILSON. INC. <br />CMLRD Regulations require a long term FS of at least 1.5. We performed a drained (long -term) <br />analysis and defined pore water pressures by a piezometric line. As previously discussed in <br />Section 6, we considered two failure mechanisms: a smaller -scale toe failure and a larger -scale <br />crest failure. The results of the parametric analysis are presented in Figure 10 with details in <br />Appendix C. <br />Prior to publication of our report, Colowyo informed us the spoil slope will be decreased from <br />the 3H:1 V slope used in our models to a slope of 3.5H:1 V. The flatter slope will in all cases <br />increase the calculated FS for the cases we modeled. In Case 22, we did use the flatter 3.5H:1 V <br />slope and this case resulted in a FS of 1.6 for the flatter slope. to <br />Using the soil and rock shear strength parameters discussed in Section 6, we analyzed baseline <br />cases for both models. For the Clay Layer at Base of Spoil model we computed an FS of 2.2 for <br />a larger -scale crest failure and a FS of 2.4 for a smaller -scale toe failure. For the baseline case <br />for Carbonaceous Mudstone /Claystone at Base of Spoil model we computed a FS of 2.1 for a <br />larger -scale toe failure and a FS of 1.7 for a larger -scale crest failure. <br />In addition to analyzing the baseline cases for Sections A -A' and B -B', we also performed a <br />parametric study in which we varied shear strength parameters, ground water conditions, and <br />bedrock dips. <br />0 <br />For the Clay Layer at Base of Spoil model, the results of our parametric study indicate the static <br />FS against slope instability is greater than or equal to 1.5 for all combinations of shear strength <br />parameters and ground water conditions, as required by CMLRB regulations. Additionally, we <br />performed a pseudo- static analysis and computed FS greater than 1.5 for both the smaller -scale <br />toe failure and larger -scale crest failures. Depending on groundwater conditions and shear <br />strength parameters, the smaller -scale toe failure tended to be more critical than the larger -scale <br />crest failure. For Trials 5, 7, and 9, the FSs for the two different failures were similar as the <br />failure surface began to approach an infinite slope condition. The FS for larger -scale crest <br />failures tended to be relatively insensitive to changes in groundwater elevation up to 40 feet <br />above the base of the spoil. <br />Our parametric study of the Carbonaceous Mudstone /Claystone at Base of Spoil yielded similar <br />results. A static FS of 1.5 or greater was computed for larger and smaller scale failure modes for <br />all combinations of shear strength parameters, bedrock dip, and groundwater conditions. <br />23 -1- 01101 -400 -R l .docx/wpAkn 23-1-01101-400 <br />11 <br />Exh. 23 -1 -18 Revision Date: 08/05/09 <br />Revision No.: PR -03 <br />