Laserfiche WebLink
areas exceeded reference standard is a conservative demonstration of success (although I will still have to check some of <br />the numbers and run the t-tests). <br />A footnote should be attached to Table 1 to acknowledge that Biologic did not employ the soil factor adjustment, along <br />with the explanation for why the t-test success demonstrations for 2007 and 2008 IP sampled areas are more <br />conservative than if the soil factor adjustments had been applied. <br />Daniel T. Mathews <br />Environmental Protection Specialist <br />Colorado Division of Reclamation, Mining and Safety <br />101 South 3rd, Suite 301, Grand Junction, CO 81501 <br />Phone: (970) 242-5025 <br />Fax: (970) 241-1516 <br />daniel.mathews@state.co.us <br />From: Ben Langenfeld [mailto:benl@lewicki.biz] <br />Sent: Monday, March 08, 2010 1:50 PM <br />To: Mathews, Dan <br />Subject: SL-12 Error <br />Dan <br />It looks like there was an error in where the soil correction table was supposed to be. I've corrected it by adding the table <br />showing the soil correction factors for IP in the SL text itself. I'm including a PDF copy for you to look at and make sure <br />that it is what you were talking about. Let me know if there is anything else. <br />Ben Langenfeld, Project Engineer <br />Greg Lewicki and Associates <br />office: (720) 842-5321 <br />cell: (303) 960-5613 <br />fax: (303) 346-6934