Laserfiche WebLink
(Page 4) <br />2. Problem: The existing Reclamation Plan is not consistent with the reclamation plan on file with the <br />Division. <br />Amendment to the Permit an amended reclamation plan and reclamation plan map with sufficient <br />detail to describe all aspects of the existing plan. All sections of Rule 6.4.5 and Rule 6.4.6 must be <br />addressed in sufficient detail. The operator should give particular attention to: 1) A descrintion of <br />man-made structures and facilities that will be removed and that will remain on site after closure, 2) <br />A description of earthmoving activities and volumes required for regrading and reshaping, 3) A plan <br />for sloping and stabilization of the reservoir shorelines, 4) Detailed plans for installation of a clay <br />liner or a slurry wall, or plans for augmentation, 5) Plans for placement of topsoil or other growth <br />media, 6) The revegetation plan, 7) Plans for post-closure monitoring, and 8) A statement that the <br />Town of Arvada will accept responsibility for maintenance of the reservoir and assumption of legal <br />liability. Operator has 90 days from the date of this inspection report, which will be 16 June 2010, to <br />comply with this Corrective Action. <br />6 /16 /10 <br />PB or PV: PB <br />TOPIC(S): _AL <br />RS