My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2010-02-02_REVISION - M1979181
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1979181
>
2010-02-02_REVISION - M1979181
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/16/2021 6:03:06 PM
Creation date
3/16/2010 10:24:37 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1979181
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
2/2/2010
Doc Name
Solids analysis 2008-2009
From
Grayling LLC
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
TR2
Email Name
WHE
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
60
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
AraZ Laboratories, Inc. <br />2773 Downhill Drive Steamboat Springs, CO 80487 (800) 334-5493 ,} =y e <br />Mount Sneffels Mining Company, LLC ACZ Project ID: L79933 <br />7W. "'XIIEF - ... 0 __....... __. - . <br />WG276394 Mercury (1312) M7470A CVAA RA Relative Percent Difference (RPD) was not used for data <br /> validation because the sample concentration is too low for <br /> accurate evaluation (< 10x MDL). <br />WG276474 Nickel (1312) M6010B ICP RA Relative Percent Difference (RPD) was not used for data <br /> validation because the sample concentration is too low for <br /> accurate evaluation (< 10x MDL). <br />WG276402 Nickel, total (3050) M6010B ICP M1 Matrix spike recovery was high, the recovery of the <br /> associated control sample (LCS or LFB) was acceptable. <br />WG276474 Potassium (1312) M6010B ICP RA Relative Percent Difference (RPD) was not used for data <br /> validation because the sample concentration is too low for <br /> accurate evaluation (< 10x MDL). <br />M6010B ICP ZG The ICP Serial Dilution was not used for data validation <br /> because the sample concentration was less than 50 times <br /> the MDL. <br />WG276458 Selenium (1312) M6020 ICP-MS ZB The ICP-MS Serial Dilution was not used for data validation <br /> because the sample concentration was less than 100 times <br /> the MDL. <br />WG276474 Silver (1312) M6010B ICP RA Relative Percent Difference (RPD) was not used for data <br /> validation because the sample concentration is too low for <br /> accurate evaluation (< 10x MDL). <br />WG276458 Thallium (1312) M6020 ICP-MS RA Relative Percent Difference (RPD) was not used for data <br /> validation because the sample concentration is too low for <br /> accurate evaluation (< 10x MDL). <br />WG276474 Vanadium (1312) M6010B ICP RA Relative Percent Difference (RPD) was not used for data <br /> validation because the sample concentration is too low for <br /> accurate evaluation (< 10x MDL). <br />Zinc (1312) M6010B ICP RA Relative Percent Difference (RPD) was not used for data <br /> validation because the sample concentration is too low for <br /> accurate evaluation (< 10x MDL). <br />WG276402 Zinc, total (3050) M6010B ICP ZH Serial Dilution exceeded the acceptance criteria. Matrix <br /> interference [physical or chemical] is suspected. <br />WG276503 Sulfur Sulfate M600/2-78-054 3.2.4 RA Relative Percent Difference (RPD) was not used for data <br /> validation because the sample concentration is too low for <br /> accurate evaluation (< 1 Ox MDL). <br />WG276860 Chloride (1312 DI) SM45000I-E HD Analysis is outside the intended scope of the method, <br /> which does not provide hold time information for soil <br /> extracts. The method hold time for extraction-to-analysis <br /> was met. <br />SM45000I-E RA Relative Percent Difference (RPD) was not used for data <br /> validation because the sample concentration is too low for <br /> accurate evaluation (< 1 Ox MDL). <br />WG276813 Conductivity @25C (1312-DI) SM2510B RD For a solid matrix, the duplicate RPD (spike or matrix) <br /> exceeded the control limit, which is attributable to the non- <br /> homogeneity of the sample. <br />WG276861 Sulfate (1312 DI) 375.4 - Turbidimetric HD Analysis is outside the intended scope of the method, <br /> which does not provide hold time information for soil <br /> extracts. The method hold time for extraction-to-analysis <br /> was met. <br />375.4 - Turbidimetric M3 The spike recovery value is unusable since the analyte <br /> concentration in the sample is disproportionate to the spike <br /> level. The recovery of the associated control sample (LCS <br /> or LFB) was acceptable. <br />375.4 - Turbidimetric RA Relative Percent Difference (RPD) was not used for data <br /> validation because the sample concentration is too low for <br /> accurate evaluation (< 10x MDL). <br />WG276813 Total Alkalinity SM2320B - Titration RD For a solid matrix, the duplicate RPD (spike or matrix) <br /> exceeded the control limit, which is attributable to the non- <br /> homogeneity of the sample. <br />REPAD.15.06.05.01 <br />Page 33 of 39
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.