Laserfiche WebLink
p.1 <br />r <br />ti <br />?AaA, ) <br />Division of Reclamation, Mining, and Safety <br />1313 Sherman Street <br />Room 215 <br />Denver, Colorado 80203 <br />Re: Letter dated February 11, 2010 <br />Dear Marcia, Sandy, and Dan: <br />When I objected to Permit-Renewal#5, We told Marcia that we had not gotten a copy of that. <br />ALL of you PROMISED faithfully that anything that concerned the Morgan Property that MR. <br />Morgan would receive a copy of that permit, revision, etc. THAT WAS NEVER DONE. Also, <br />I don't care that it included TR-55, Western fuels Permit Renewal I just couldn't give?hing <br />to do with the other. My objection still stood for The <br />specifics because I had nothing to read. Some of the Renewals do not have numbers nor does <br />some of the permit revisions, so sometimes, we don't even know which one is which. Yoitlaws <br />state that they must be much more specific in identifying eachjthan they are. <br />When we received the telephone message from <br />that it in <br />been at the court house, because of <br />that we had not gotten to read that renewal <br />JURY duty, they ran us out,, we looked at a few pages of what we thought was permit <br />Renewal#5 and when we went back, it was no longer there. The Federal and State laws require <br />for ALL information that is not confidential to remain at the court house for public inspection for <br />the duration of the mining activities <br />We were alsotold that one of yo went up <br />NOT THERE! those <br />there yesterday and IT WAS S <br />representing you were there about a week ago, so you should have known yourselves that IT IS <br />NOT THERE! So, I really don't care if you say it was publicized in the paper for PUBLIC <br />COMMENT! When? 2007? Then you did not make a decision until 2009? If it was not there to <br />be read by the public, then your public comment period means absolutely NOTHING! Mr. <br />Morgan NEVER received a copy. As far as I am concerned, you guys have violated again all of <br />the Federal and State Laws. <br />If you actually do a MONTHLY inspection as you told everyone at the meeting, every month, <br />then you would have seen for yourselves tht Permmost it Rnew things <br />al #5 was one of the MOSTbe at the <br />court house for public viewing are not there! <br />CRITICAL to US! During the public comment period, if it was there for one day, then we were <br />asked to leave by the Attorneys and when we returned in a few days, it was no longer there. But, <br />even when we told you guys that we had not read it in August, you continued with your decision <br />without supplying MR. Morgan with a copy and since we had to object to SPECIFICS contained <br />within the renewal, that was kinda hard when we had nothing to read or look at.