My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2010-03-02_APPLICATION CORRESPONDENCE - C2009087
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Application Correspondence
>
Coal
>
C2009087
>
2010-03-02_APPLICATION CORRESPONDENCE - C2009087
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 4:00:22 PM
Creation date
3/5/2010 8:13:03 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C2009087
IBM Index Class Name
Application Correspondence
Doc Date
3/2/2010
Doc Name
Adequacy Review of Permit Application
From
DRMS
To
Peabody Energy Corporation
Email Name
TAK
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
STATE OF COLORADO <br />DIVISION OF RECLAMATION, MINING AND SAFETY <br />Department of Natural Resources <br />1313 Sherman St., Room 215 <br />Denver, Colorado 80203 <br />Phone: (303) 866-3567 <br />FAX: (303) 832-8106 <br />March 2, 2010 <br />Mr. Vern Pfannenstiel <br />Manager Environmental Services <br />Peabody Energy Corporation <br />3001 West Shamrell Boulevard, Suite 110 <br />Flagstaff, AZ 86001 <br />Re: Peabody Sage Creek Mine (C-2009-087) <br />Adequacy Review of Permit Application <br />Dear Mr. Pfannenstiel: <br />Additional adequacy review comments 57 through 64 are provided below. <br />Section 2.03.10 <br />COLORADO <br />D I V I S ION OF <br />RECLAMATION <br />MINING <br />SAFETY <br />Bill Ritter, Jr. <br />Governor <br />James B. Martin <br />Executive Director <br />57. Please add to Section 2.03. 10 a description of any required specific approval that PSCM <br />has received from Routt County for hauling coal mine waste on the county road from <br />PSCM to the Foidel Creek Mine. <br />58. Has the Foidel Creek Mine received DRMS approval for disposing PSCM's coal mine <br />waste, as required by Rule 4.10(2)? <br />Sections 2.04.3 <br />59. Please add to page 2.04.3 text that clarifies the meaning of "passive recreation". <br />Section 2.05.3 <br />60. Please add to page 2.05-7 the swell factors required by Rule 2.05.3(6)for the temporary <br />overburden stockpile material during each phase of operations (for example, when the <br />portal face-up is excavated and when the stockpile is regraded to postmining contours). <br />61. Maps 2.05.3 M 1 A and M 1 B show two areas within the support facilities area south of <br />Pecoco Pond and northwest of culvert 31A that are proposed for new disturbance or <br />redisturbance by PSCM activities. Maps or text do not provide descriptions of the <br />support facilities (excavations, structures, or materials storage, etc) that are proposed in <br />these areas. Such information is needed for evaluating the adequacy of drainage control <br />(Rules 4.04 and 4.05) and for estimating reclamation costs (Rule 2.05.4(2)(b)). Rule <br />2.03.3(1) requires information in the application be presented clearly. Rule 2.05.3(3) <br />Office of Office of <br />Mined Land Reclamation Denver • Grand Junction • Durango Active and Inactive Mines
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.