My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2010-01-21_REVISION - C1996083
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Coal
>
C1996083
>
2010-01-21_REVISION - C1996083
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 3:58:49 PM
Creation date
1/22/2010 8:28:14 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1996083
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
1/21/2010
Doc Name
Adequacy Review Letter
From
DRMS
To
Bowie Resources, LLC
Type & Sequence
TR66
Email Name
JJD
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
STATE OF COLORADO <br />DIVISION OF RECLAMATION, MINING AND SAFETY <br />Department of Natural Resources <br />1313 Sherman St., Room 215 <br />Denver, Colorado 80203 <br />Phone: (303) 866-3567 <br />FAX: (303) 832-8106 <br />January 21, 2010 <br />Mr. William A. Bear <br />Bowie Resources LLC <br />P.O. Box 483 <br />Paonia, Colorado 81428 <br />RE: Bowie No. 2 Mine, Permit No. C-96-083, Bowie Resources LLC <br />Technical Revision No. 66, Terror Creek Vent Shaft, Adequacy Review <br />Dear Mr. Bear: <br />COLORADO <br />DIVISION Of <br />RECLAMATION <br />MINING <br />SAFETY <br />Bill Ritter, Jr. <br />Governor <br />Harris D. Sherman <br />Executive Director <br />Ronald W. Cattany <br />Division Director <br />Natural Resource Trustee <br />The Colorado Division of Reclamation, Mining and Safety (Division) has finished its adequacy <br />review for Technical Revision No. 66 (TR-66), submitted by Bowie Resources LLC (BRL) for the <br />Bowie No. 2 Mine. The following are the Division's questions and comments: <br />Ground Water HydroloJ,v <br />The Terror Creek vent shaft is summarized on revised page 2.05-16 and only briefly <br />described on page 2.05-68. BRL states that the perimeter of the shaft will be grouted <br />through any water bearing zones but no further information is provided. It is our <br />understanding that ring grouting will be used to establish a grout barrier in the water <br />bearing zones prior to construction of the shaft. The geotechnical hole proposed with <br />TR-65 will provide hydrogeologic information regarding the depth and location of the <br />water bearing zones which will aid in developing the plans for grouting the shaft. Please <br />update revised page 2.05-68 with sufficient detail describing how the shaft will be <br />grouted through any water bearing zones. <br />2. Rule 4.07 requires that all drilled holes and underground openings be permanently sealed. <br />Please add detailed plans to the permit application describing how the shaft will be <br />permanently sealed when it is no longer needed. <br />Reclamation Cost Estimate <br />3. Attached is the Division's calculation of the reclamation cost estimate. The estimate is six <br />tasks (a summary sheet and tasks 221-225) and represents an increase in liability of <br />$208,818.00. This increase is slightly less than the estimated liability of $225,324.00 <br />submitted by BRL. The main reason for this difference is that BRL used a larger diameter <br />office of Office of <br />Mined Land Reclamation Denver • Grand Junction • Durango Active and Inactive Mines
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.