My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2009-12-21_REVISION - M1980244 (28)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1980244
>
2009-12-21_REVISION - M1980244 (28)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/15/2021 5:52:23 PM
Creation date
12/30/2009 8:52:39 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1980244
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
12/21/2009
Doc Name
QA Liner Recertification, Monitoring and Test results,
From
CC&V
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
AM9
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
30
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Cripple Creek & Victor Gold Mining Company <br />Cresson Project <br />. Quality Assurance Monitoring and Test Results <br />Liner Recertification <br />December 17, 2009 <br />ameO <br />one end of the sealed channel. Lonestar pressurized the air channel to approximately <br />30 pounds per square inch (psi) using an air pump. After pressure stabilization, AMEC <br />monitored the gauge for a minimum of five minutes. The maximum allowable pressure drop <br />was 3 psi. <br />Lonestar and AMEC verified fusion seam continuity before heat - sealing both seam ends, <br />completed pressure testing, and with the gauge left in place, cut the opposite end of the seam. <br />If the gauge pressure dropped to zero, the seam was determined to be continuous. In cases <br />where the seam was found to be discontinuous, the seam was subdivided into shorter sections <br />until continuous seam sections were located and passing pressure tests were performed, or the <br />outer edge of the seam was extrusion welded and vacuum tested. <br />If a pressure test failed, Lonestar checked the seam section for leakage, and repaired and <br />re- tested the seam. If Lonestar was unable to find the leak, the seam was divided into two <br />sections, with each section being tested to locate the area of concern. This subdivision process <br />was repeated until the leak location was identified. If the leak area was not located, Lonestar <br />reconstructed the seam, and then vacuum tested the repair. <br />Lonestar tested extrusion welded seam sections with a vacuum box. Prior to vacuum box <br />testing, Lonestar applied a soap and water solution to the seam section. The vacuum box was <br />then placed over the seam area and energized with a vacuum pump capable of creating a <br />vacuum of not less than 5 psi. Lonestar and AMEC observed the action of the vacuum on the <br />seam for a minimum of ten seconds. Each consecutively tested seam length was overlapped a <br />minimum of 3 inches. If soap bubbles appeared, AMEC marked and documented the leak <br />location. Lonestar then repaired the leak and vacuum tested the repair. This procedure was <br />also followed to test extrusion repairs and extrusion patches. <br />The seam non - destructive test summaries (fusion pressure tests and extrusion vacuum tests) <br />for the geomembrane are presented in Appendix 1 -5. <br />0 <br />S: \PROJECTS \1125E CCV COA \H2 - DESIGN\LINER RECERTIFICATION REPORT\REPORT BODY\OA MONTIORING AND TEST RESULTS LINER 21 <br />RECERTI FICATION. DOC <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.