My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2009-12-17_REVISION - M1994097
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1994097
>
2009-12-17_REVISION - M1994097
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/15/2021 5:39:04 PM
Creation date
12/22/2009 8:25:14 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1994097
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
12/17/2009
Doc Name
Preliminary Adequacy Review
From
DRMS
To
United/Old Castle SW Group, Inc.
Type & Sequence
AM3
Email Name
GRM
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Preliminary Adequacy Review <br />M- 1994 -097 <br />Spring Creek Pit <br />Per Rule 1.6.2(d) the Division requires proof of publication in a local newspaper for 4 <br />consecutive weeks. Staff has not received the proof of publication affidavit. <br />Per Rule 1.6.2(e) the Division requires proof of notice to all adjacent landowners <br />identified in the amendment application. Staff has not received proof of notice to the <br />adjacent landowners. Please note any utility or right of way holders are to be noticed <br />just as adjacent landowners. <br />Per Rule 6.2.1(2)(b) all maps must be signed by a registered land surveyor, professional <br />engineer, or other qualified person, give date prepared and identify and outline the area <br />which corresponds with the application. Staff notes no signatures on any maps. Please <br />clearly define permit acreage and affected acreage area boundaries on all maps, <br />required signatures and other corrections noted below. <br />P er Rule 6 4, Specific requirements for a 112 Reclamat Opera tion: <br />6.4.1 — Exhibit A, Legal Description is adequate. <br />6.4.2 — Exhibit B, Index Map is adequate. <br />6.4.3 — Exhibit C, Pre - Mining and Mining Maps. <br />(a) Neither C -1 nor C -2 identifies adjacent landowners. <br />(b) appears to be adequate. <br />(c) is adequate. <br />(d) Please clearly define "affected" areas versus permitted areas. <br />(e) is adequate. <br />(f) Please note any stormwater control structures and a general wash pond <br />location per phase. <br />(g) Please identify all utility and other structure owners within 200 feet of the <br />proposed permit boundaries. <br />6.4.4 — Exhibit D, Mining Plan <br />(a) Noted in Mining Plan narration. <br />(b) Noted in Mining Plan narration. <br />(c) Please address any irrigation ditch movement and required stormwater <br />structures. <br />(d) Noted in Mining Plan narration. <br />(e) Noted in Mining Plan narration. <br />(f) Please describe the nature of the deposit. Current narration addresses <br />tonnages but not requirements of this subsection. <br />(g) Noted in Mining Plan narration. <br />(h) Noted in Mining Plan narration. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.