2009-12-16_PERMIT FILE - M2009078 ‎(2)‎

• Permit No: M2009078
• IBM Index Class Name: PERMIT FILE
• Doc Date: 12/16/2009
• Doc Name: Preliminary Adequacy Review
• From: DRMS
• To: Greg Lewicki and Associates
• Email Name: GRM
• Media Type: D
• Archive: No

(7) is adequate per plan narration.
(8) is adequate per plan narration.
(9) is not applicable.
Rule 3. 1.11 is adequate per plan narration.
Rule 3.1.12 is adequate.
Rule 3.1.13 The requirements for spill reporting are outlined and adequate per
plan narration.
6.4.6 — Exhibit F, the Reclamation Map, F -1 is adequate.
6.4.7 — Exhibit G, Water Information, DRMS has not received a copy of the applicant's
response to DWR. Further review may be required.
6.4.8 — Exhibit H, Wildlife DRMS has not received a copy of the applicant's
response to DWR. Further review may be required.
6.4.9 — Exhibit 1, Soils is adequate.
6.4. 10 — Exhibit J, Vegetation is adequate.
6.4.11 — Exhibit K, Climate
6.4.12 — Exhibit L, Reclamation Costs is acceptable at this time. However, staff will
calculate an estimate after the review is completed.
6.4.13 - Exhibit M, Other Permits is adequate.
6.4.14 — Exhibit N Source of Legal Right to Enter appears to be acceptable.
6.4.15 — Exhibit O, Owners of Record: appears to be acceptable.
6.4.16 — Exhibit P, Municipalities within 2 miles, City of Craig is noted.
6.4.17 — Exhibit Q, Proof of Notice to County Board and Soil Conservation is noted.
6.4.18 — Exhibit R, Proof of Filing with County Clerk is noted.
6.4.19 — Exhibit S, Permanent Man-made structures appear to be identified
Rule 6.5: Geotechnical Stability Exhibit: Engineering review is noted and acceptable.