Laserfiche WebLink
Harry Ranney -2- April 19, 1993 <br /> 4 . The statement "A hydrologic reclamation pan is not considered <br /> necessary at this time" was deleted from page 2.05-36. <br /> The following revised pages and drawings comprise this application <br /> for a technical revision: <br /> Page Description of Change <br /> 2 .05-35 Revised Reed Chatfield Ditch designation to R-1 from C-1. <br /> 2.05-35a New page that explains how monitoring is performed. <br /> 2.05-36 Removed the statement "A hydrologic reclamation pan is <br /> not considered necessary at this time" . <br /> Exhibit 3 Revised pages 3-2 through 3-16b and 3-20 through 3-23. <br /> Added units of measurement, added monitoring data through <br /> 1992 and revised the data so results below detection <br /> limits are not shown. <br /> Please call if you have any questions. <br /> Sincerely, <br /> Jim Stover, P.E. <br /> Consulting Engineer <br /> cc: Rick Ward <br />