My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2009-10-15_REVISION - M2001085
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M2001085
>
2009-10-15_REVISION - M2001085
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/15/2021 5:44:14 PM
Creation date
10/16/2009 12:57:54 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2001085
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
10/15/2009
Doc Name
Additional Info.
From
120th Estate Partners
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
AM4
Email Name
DB2
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
53
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Water Storage Pond Compacted Clay Liner <br />Parcel 1, S%, SW'/, , Section 35, T1S, R67W <br />Adams County, Colorado <br />backiill soils, installation of shoring, or foundation construction. Placement of fill/backfill <br />soils should be observed by the geotechnical engineer, and the soils tested. <br />The geotechnical recommendations presented in this report are highly contingent upon <br />observation and testing of project earthwork by representatives of GROUND. If another <br />geotechnical consultant is selected to provide construction observation and quality <br />control, then that consultant must assume all responsibility for the geotechnical aspects <br />of the project by concurring in writing with the recommendations in this report, or by <br />providing alternative recommendations. <br />Limitations This report has been prepared for GSL of Illinois, as it pertains the lining of <br />the subject water storage pond as described herein. It may not contain sufficient <br />information for other parties or other purposes. In addition, GROUND has assumed that <br />project construction will commence by Autumn, 2010. Changes in project plans or <br />schedule should be brought to the attention of a geotechnical engineer, in order that the <br />geotechnical recommendations may be re-evaluated and, as necessary, modified. <br />The geotechnical conclusions and recommendations in this report relied upon <br />subsurface exploration at a limited number of test holes, as shown on Figure 1 of <br />GROUND's November 8, 2002, report. Subsurface conditions were interpolated <br />between and extrapolated beyond these locations. <br />if during construction, surface, soil, bedrock, or groundwater conditions appear to be at <br />significant variance with those described herein, a geotechnical engineer should be <br />advised at once, so that re-evaluation of the recommendations may be made in a timely <br />manner. Findings were dependent on the limited amount of direct evidence obtained at <br />the time of this geotechnical evaluation. Our recommendations were developed for the <br />site conditions as described above. Actual conditions exposed during construction may <br />be anticipated to differ, somewhat, from those encountered during site exploration. <br />In addition, a contractor who relies upon this report for development of his scope of work <br />or cost estimates may consider the geotechnical information in this report to be <br />inadequate for his purposes or find the geotechnical conditions described herein to be at <br />variance with his experience in the greater project area. In such cases, the contractor <br />should obtain the additional geotechnical information that he considers necessary to <br />develop his workscope and cost estimates with sufficient precision. <br />Job No. 09-3090 GROUND Engineering Consultants, Inc. Page 9
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.