Laserfiche WebLink
3 u <br /> III. COMMENTS-COMPLIANCE <br /> Below are comments on the inspection. The comments include discussion of observations made during the <br /> inspection. Comments also describe any enforcement actions taken during the inspection and the facts or <br /> evidence supporting the enforcement action. <br /> condition of liner material, and apparent channel functioning and stability were noted and <br /> compared to permit specifications. Observations were also made regarding the apparent stability <br /> of hillslope locations throughout the area, including the site of the small slump located to the east <br /> of PM-8, which had been noted and repaired in 2008, and the various locations where gullies or <br /> areas of concentrated rill erosion had been graded, roughened and seeded. Attachment 1 to this <br /> inspection report is a spreadsheet listing of site locations where measurements and/or digital <br /> photographs were taken, along with pertinent data and comments. The attachment addresses <br /> each of the three areas inspected during the SL-4 inspection(East Wadge Area, Solid Waste <br /> Disposal Site, and Channel PM-12A). Pertinent photos are included in Attachment 2 to this <br /> report. <br /> In general, the drainage improvements made within the East Wadge Area since 2007 appear to <br /> have been quite effective. A few widely scattered rills up to 10" deep were noted between the 2- <br /> track route and V-Ditch#1, and in a few locations on the slopes between V-Ditches. These <br /> scattered rills all appeared to be healing; hand maintenance such as small rock checks or staked <br /> straw wattles in some locations would likely accelerate recovery. The rills should be monitored <br /> under the operator's approved rill and gully plan to ensure continued recovery. No equipment <br /> work is recommended for these isolated hillslope rills. The 2008 slump repair area appeared <br /> stable, with no new cracks or other indications of movement apparent(Photo #460). No <br /> additional slumps or areas of cracks or other indicators of potential mass instability were <br /> observed in the East Wadge Area. Regraded/roughened/seeded areas which had been eroded <br /> prior to TR-41 drainage improvements appear to be erosionally stable, although vegetation is still <br /> at an early successional stage in these areas (Photo# 464). <br /> The V-Ditches were in general constructed in accordance with approved designs, although <br /> vegetation along the channels is not yet well established, and shallow scour was observed in <br /> some locations. Typical V-Ditch segments are depicted in Photo#450 and 462. The operator <br /> will need to monitor the condition of the V-Ditch channels to ensure that adequate vegetation <br /> does become established, and that channel rills do not worsen. The V-Ditches are generally <br /> over-sized, and hand installation of small rock checks, straw wattles, or similar structures in <br /> series could be employed without compromising ditch capacity. Such structures may be useful to <br /> minimize scour until a stabilizing vegetative cover becomes established. <br /> One problem location was observed with respect to V-Ditch construction and functioning, which <br /> will need to be repaired prior to Phase 1 bond release approval. The lower-most segment of V-3 <br /> (approximately 30 feet in length extending up from the junction with PM-8) was steeper than <br /> 5 <br />