My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2009-10-05_REVISION - M1987049 (13)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1987049
>
2009-10-05_REVISION - M1987049 (13)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/15/2021 3:06:04 PM
Creation date
10/6/2009 8:05:50 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1987049
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
10/5/2009
Doc Name
Adequacy Review Response Number 2
From
Hart Environmental
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
AM2
Email Name
JLE
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
36
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
9. "The Reclamation Plan map indicates that phase 18 will be used for water storage <br />instead of an open water lake. Is the new plan to install a slurry wall around Phase <br />18? Please explain this discrepancy? If Phase 18 will remain an open water lake, <br />please update the reclamation plan map to display with land use instead of water <br />storage. " <br />Applicant's Response: <br />The Applicant's proposed post reclamation land use for Phase 18 is open water, not <br />water storage. Please see revised Exhibit F-Reclamation Plan Map (sheet 7 of 7). <br />10. "The topography of Cell No. 2 area is not portrayed too much different than the pre- <br />mining plan maps of this area. The topographic lines are poorly labeled and hard to <br />read, but the pit slopes appear to remain steep surrounding the "wetlands" and <br />"backfilled" areas. Also, either large mounds or depressions are indicated to be left <br />in place surrounding the "backf lied" area and "wetlands. " Given the post mine land <br />use for this area, these contour lines do not coincide with the reclamation plan. In <br />accordance with Rule 6. 4.6 the reclamation plan map must indicate the expected <br />physical appearance of the affected land, and the map must show the proposed <br />topography of the area with contour lines of sufficient detail to portray the direction <br />and rate of slope of all reclaimed lands. Please submit a reclamation map with the <br />appropriate contour lines indicating the expected physical appearance of the lands <br />surrounding the backfilled area and "wetlands" of Cell No. 2. " <br />Applicant's Response: <br />Please see attached revised Exhibit F-Reclamation Plan Map (sheet 7 of 7). <br />11. Similar to the above item, the proposed topography of the reclaimed expansion area <br />does not seem to coincide with the mining and reclamation plan... Please re-draw the <br />proposed contours of this area to coincide (with) the mining and reclamation plan. " <br />Applicant's Response: <br />Please see attached revised Exhibit D-Mining Plan and Exhibit F-Reclamation Plan <br />(sheets 6 and 7of 7). <br />12. "In regard to item #6 above, please highlight the areas where each of the proposed <br />seed mixtures will be used. " <br />Applicant's Response: <br />Please see attached revised Exhibit F-Reclamation Plan Map (sheet 7 of 7). <br />10/2/2009 4
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.