Laserfiche WebLink
MEETINGS HAS FOCUSED ON RESIDENTS' BELIEFS THAT MINE WASTES DO NOT PRESENT A PROBLEM WORTHY OF <br />THE HIGH LEVEL OF ATTENTION GIVEN TO THIS SITE. IN ADDITION, THERE IS A GENERAL ANTAGONISM <br />TOWARD OTHER FEDERAL AGENCIES BECAUSE OF MINING REGULATIONS THAT AREA RESIDENTS BELIEVE HAVE <br />RESTRICTED MINING ACTIVITY IN THE AREA. <br />0 SEVERAL OCCASIONS, NEW INFORMATION ABOUT ONGOING WORK AT THE SITE HAS BEEN THE SUBJECT OF <br />EXTENSIVE NEWS AND EDITORIAL COVERAGE IN LOCAL NEWSPAPERS, IN PARTICULAR DURING EPA'S REMOVAL <br />ACTION AT THE GREGORY TAILINGS IN THE SPRING OF 1987. RESIDENTS EXPRESSED CONCERN ABOUT THE <br />COST AND NECESSITY OF CONDUCTING THE WORK, PARTICULARLY IN LIGHT OF THE POSSIBILITY THAT THE <br />PROPERTY OWNER, A LOCAL RESIDENT, MIGHT HAVE TO REPAY THE GOVERNMENT LATER FOR THE COSTS. THE <br />PILOT PASSIVE TREATMENT PROJECT AT THE BIG FIVE TUNNEL PORTAL HAS BEEN CLOSELY FOLLOWED IN THE <br />LOCAL NEWSPAPERS AS WELL. LOCAL INTEREST AMONG RESIDENTS AND IN AREA NEWSPAPERS INCREASED AGAIN <br />DURING THE PUBLIC COMMENT PERIOD ON THE OPERABLE UNIT NO. TWO FS REPORT ON TAILINGS AND WASTE <br />ROCK PILES. IN GENERAL, CITIZENS HAVE QUESTIONED THE NEED FOR REMEDIAL WORK ON THE TAILINGS AND <br />WASTE ROCK PILES, WHICH HAVE BEEN IN PLACE FOR MANY YEARS. AREA RESIDENTS AND LOCAL NEWSPAPERS <br />HAVE EXPRESSED RELATIVELY LESS INTEREST IN THE OVERALL MINE DRAINAGE PROBLEM THAN IN THE GREGORY <br />TAILINGS OR THE BIG FIVE TUNNEL PROJECTS. <br />IN PREPARING THE REVISED COMMUNITY RELATIONS PLAN (CRP) COMPLETED IN JANUARY 1986, EPA CONDUCTED <br />DISCUSSIONS WITH LOCAL OFFICIALS AND COMMUNITY MEMBERS IN SEPTEMBER 1985. THE ORIGINAL CRP WAS <br />PREPARED IN THE FALL OF 1982. TO FACILITATE THE FLOW OF INFORMATION TO THE COMMUNITIES, <br />INFORMATION REPOSITORIES WERE ESTABLISHED AT THE GILPIN COUNTY COURT HOUSE IN CENTRAL CITY, THE <br />IDAHO SPRINGS PUBLIC LIBRARY IN IDAHO SPRINGS, AND THE EPA LIBRARY IN DENVER IN THE FALL OF <br />1985. IN DECEMBER 1985, EPA PREPARED AND DISTRIBUTED TO RESIDENTS AN INITIAL FACT SHEET <br />DESCRIBING THE SITE AND THE POTENTIAL CONTAMINANTS OF CONCERN. <br />EPA PREPARED AND DISTRIBUTED A SECOND FACT SHEET IN JULY 1986 REGARDING THE EMERGENCY REMOVAL <br />ACTION (ERA) PLANNED AT THE GREGORY TAILINGS FOR THE FALL OF 1986. THE AGENCY HELD A PUBLIC <br />COMMENT PERIOD ON THE PROPOSED ACTION AND HELD A PUBLIC MEETING WITH LOCAL RESIDENTS. AS <br />DESCRIBED IN THE RESPONSIVENESS SUMMARY PREPARED FOR OPERABLE UNIT NO. ONE, THE ERA WAS LATER <br />NDUCTED AS A SUPERFUND REMOVAL ACTION IN THE SPRING OF 1987. PUBLIC CONCERN AT THAT TIME WAS <br />CUSED ON THE COST OF THE REMOVAL ACTION, THE POTENTIAL LIABILITY OF THE PROPERTY OWNER (WHO IS <br />A LIFE-LONG RESIDENT OF THE COMMUNITY), THE POTENTIAL LOSS OF AN HISTORIC SITE, AND THE <br />POTENTIAL FOR EPA TO CONDUCT OTHER SIMILAR ACTIONS IN THE AREA. DURING THIS PERIOD, EPA ALSO <br />EXPANDED THE NUMBER OF INFORMATION REPOSITORIES TO INCLUDE THE GOLDEN PUBLIC LIBRARY IN GOLDEN <br />AND THE IDAHO SPRINGS CITY HALL IN IDAHO SPRINGS, TO MAKE SITE-RELATED DOCUMENTS MORE ACCESSIBLE <br />TO THE COMMUNITY. <br />IN AUGUST 1987, EPA PLACED THE ENTIRE ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD FOR THE SITE IN THE GILPIN COUNTY <br />COURT HOUSE AND THE EPA LIBRARY. AN INDEX TO THE ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD WAS PLACED IN ALL FIVE <br />INFORMATION REPOSITORIES. IN ADDITION, EPA FURTHER REVISED THE CRP AND SIGNED A MEMORANDUM OF <br />UNDERSTANDING WITH THE COLORADO STATE HISTORICAL SOCIETY CONCERNING THE GREGORY TAILINGS REMOVAL <br />ACTION TO ASSURE THAT THE ACTION THAT EPA UNDERTOOK AT THE SITE WAS CARRIED OUT IN ACCORDANCE <br />WITH STATE GUIDELINES FOR PRESERVING HISTORIC SITES. <br />THE COLORADO HISTORICAL SOCIETY HAS DETERMINED THAT THE BIG FIVE TUNNEL PORTAL IS ELIGIBLE TO <br />BECOME A NATIONAL HISTORIC LANDMARK. FEDERAL LAW REQUIRES THAT ANY FEDERAL AGENCY PROPOSING TO <br />UNDERTAKE WORK AT A LOCATION ELIGIBLE FOR LISTING AS A NATIONAL HISTORIC LANDMARK DEMONSTRATE IT <br />HAS TAKEN INTO ACCOUNT HISTORIC PRESERVATION CONSIDERATIONS. THUS, EPA SUBMITTED TO THE STATE <br />ADVISORY COUNCIL ON HISTORIC PRESERVATION DRAWINGS OF THE PASSIVE TREATMENT SYSTEM AT THE BIG <br />FIVE TUNNEL PORTAL. UPON RECOMMENDATION OF THE ADVISORY COUNCIL, EPA CHANGED THE LOCATION AND <br />MATERIALS OF THE FENCE TO BE BUILT AROUND THE PASSIVE TREATMENT PLANT. THESE CHANGES WERE <br />DEEMED IMPORTANT IN PRESERVING HISTORIC ASPECTS OF THE TUNNEL. <br />DURING THE SURVEY OF SHALLOW DOMESTIC WELLS IN THE SPRING OF 1987, EPA PREPARED A LETTER TO <br />RESIDENTS AND A QUESTION-AND-ANSWER FACT SHEET -- BOTH DESIGNED TO PROVIDE RESIDENTS WITH <br />INFORMATION ABOUT THE SURVEY AND ITS PURPOSE -- TO BE HANDED OUT BY THE INDIVIDUALS TAKING THE <br />0RVEY. EPA REPRESENTATIVES ALSO MET WITH LOCAL OFFICIALS AND AREA RESIDENTS TO DISCUSS THE <br />RVEY. <br />AFTER RELEASE IN JUNE 1987 OF THE FS REPORT ON OPERABLE UNIT NO. ONE, EPA PUBLISHED A <br />QUESTION-AND-ANSWER FACT SHEET AND HELD TWO PUBLIC MEETINGS IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE PUBLIC <br />COMMENT PERIOD FROM JUNE 8 THROUGH JULY 7, 1987. AT THE FIRST MEETING IN CENTRAL CITY ON JUNE