Laserfiche WebLink
AS WITH OPERABLE UNIT NO. ONE, RESIDENTS EXPRESSED DOUBTS ABOUT THE NEED TO SOLVE A PROBLEM THEY <br />BELIEVE TO BE MINOR OR NONEXISTENT. MANY RESIDENTS EXPRESSED THE OPINION THAT EPA'S EFFORTS TO <br />SOLVE PROBLEMS AT THE FIVE MINES WOULD NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT OVERALL EFFECT ON CONTAMINATION IN <br />THE AREA OR IN THE CREEKS BECAUSE OF THE LARGE QUANTITY OF WASTE MATERIAL ELSEWHERE THAT WOULD <br />T BE ADDRESSED DURING THIS PORTION OF EPA'S WORK AT THE SITE. MANY COMMENTERS SAID THEY WOULD <br />EFER THAT EPA ALLOW PROPERTY OWNERS TO REPROCESS THE TAILINGS AS A MEANS OF CLEANING THEM UP. <br />RESIDENTS ALSO ARE CONCERNED THAT EPA'S LONG-TERM PRESENCE WILL DISCOURAGE FUTURE INVESTMENT IN <br />MINING IN THE AREA. THEY DISPUTE THE FINDINGS OF STUDIES DONE TO DATE INDICATING THAT THERE IS <br />AN IMMINENT DANGER OF COLLAPSE OF TAILINGS AND WASTE ROCK PILES AND THE FINDINGS THAT THERE MAY <br />BE POTENTIAL HEALTH RISKS RELATED TO INHALATION OR INGESTION OF TAILINGS DUST. <br />SEVERAL TECHNICAL ACTIVITIES WITH HIGH VISIBILITY IN THE COMMUNITY HAVE BEEN CONDUCTED THUS FAR. <br />THEY ARE DESCRIBED BELOW. <br />- GREGORY TAILINGS: EPA CONDUCTED A REMOVAL ACTION AT THE GREGORY INCLINE AND TAILINGS <br />IN MARCH 1987 TO PREVENT THE POSSIBLE COLLAPSE OF THE TAILINGS PILE INTO NORTH CLEAR <br />CREEK. EPA WAS CONCERNED THAT COLLAPSE OF THE TAILINGS WOULD WASH A LARGE LOAD OF <br />METALS DOWNSTREAM INTO CLEAR CREEK AND CONTAMINATE THE GOLDEN MUNICIPAL WATER SUPPLY <br />THAT IS DRAWN FROM CLEAR CREEK. <br />EPA DECREASED THE SLOPE OF THE TAILINGS PILE TO STABILIZE IT AND BUILT A RETAINING <br />WALL. EPA ORIGINALLY PLANNED TO BUILD A CULVERT AT THE GREGORY TAILINGS THROUGH AN <br />EXPEDITED RESPONSE ACTION (ERA) IN THE FALL OF 1986. ENGINEERING REPORTS WERE <br />RELEASED IN APRIL AND JUNE 1986, FOLLOWED BY A PUBLIC COMMENT PERIOD JULY 7-28, 1986. <br />EPA WAS UNABLE TO PROCEED WITH CONSTRUCTION AT THAT TIME, HOWEVER, DUE TO THE SHORTAGE <br />OF FUNDS THAT PRECEDED REAUTHORIZATION OF THE SUPERFUND PROGRAM. THE TEMPORARY <br />RETAINING WALL WAS BUILT IN MARCH 1987 UNDER THE EPA EMERGENCY RESPONSE PROGRAM. <br />- RESIDENTIAL WELLS SURVEY: DURING THE RI, EPA FOUND THAT SHALLOW GROUND WATER, A <br />COMMON SOURCE OF WATER FOR SHALLOW DOMESTIC WELLS, IS CONTAMINATED IN PLACES WITH <br />METALS, INCLUDING LEAD, ARSENIC, CADMIUM, ZINC, COPPER, NICKEL, AND CHROMIUM. IN <br />MARCH AND APRIL 1987, EPA CONDUCTED A SURVEY OF AREA HOUSEHOLDS TO DISCOVER WHETHER <br />RESIDENTS WERE USING SHALLOW WELLS. THE SURVEY REVEALED THE EXISTENCE AND USE OF A <br />FEW SHALLOW WELLS, ONE OF WHICH WAS CONTAMINATED WITH ELEVATED LEVELS OF CADMIUM. EPA <br />INFORMED THE OWNER OF THAT WELL OF THE ELEVATED LEVELS OF CADMIUM, AND SPA'S EMERGENCY <br />RESPONSE BRANCH CONDUCTED A SUPERFUND REMOVAL ACTION TO PROVIDE THE WELL OWNER WITH <br />CLEAN WATER FROM THE IDAHO SPRINGS MUNICIPAL WATER SUPPLY. <br />- PASSIVE TREATMENT PILOT PROJECT: AS PART OF THE REMEDY FOR OPERABLE UNIT NO. ONE, A <br />PILOT PROJECT FOR PASSIVE TREATMENT OF MINE DISCHARGE IS NOW UNDERWAY AT THE BIG FIVE <br />TUNNEL PORTAL. EPA HAS BUILT A CONCRETE BOX AT THE MINE PORTAL TO TREAT SOME OF THE <br />MINE DISCHARGE. AN ARTIFICIAL WETLAND HAS BEEN CREATED IN THE BOX TO STUDY THE <br />EFFICIENCY OF THIS TECHNOLOGY IN REDUCING THE LEVELS OF METALS AND NEUTRALIZING THE <br />ACID DRAINAGE. EPA EXPECTS TO USE THE RESULTS OF THIS PROJECT TO REFINE ESTIMATES OF <br />LAND REQUIREMENTS FOR PASSIVE TREATMENT AND THE TYPES OF VEGETATION MOST SUITED TO <br />THIS TECHNOLOGY FOR OPERABLE UNIT NO. ONE. <br />II. THE COMMUNITY RELATIONS PROGRAM AT THE CLEAR CREEK/CENTRAL CITY SITE <br />EPA'S COMMUNITY RELATIONS ACTIVITIES AT THE CLEAR CREEK/CENTRAL CITY SITE BEGAN IN THE FALL OF <br />1982 AFTER THE SITE WAS LISTED ON EPA'S INTERIM NATIONAL PRIORITIES LIST (NPL) IN JULY 1982. <br />THE SITE WAS PLACED ON THE FINAL NPL IN SEPTEMBER 1983. COMMUNITY CONCERN ABOUT EPA'S <br />ACTIVITIES AT THE SITE HAS TENDED TO BE MODERATE, WITH OCCASIONAL PERIODS OF HIGH INTEREST <br />CAUSED BY RESIDENT'S CONCERNS ABOUT THE ACTION AT THE GREGORY TAILINGS, THE BIG FIVE PILOT <br />PROJECT, AND EPA'S PLANS FOR THE TAILINGS AND WASTE ROCK PILES. IN ADDITION, MANY RESIDENTS ARE <br />CONCERNED THAT TWO LOCAL PROPERTY OWNERS WILL BE EXPECTED TO PAY FOR CLEANUP COSTS. MANY <br />RESIDENTS DO NOT BELIEVE LOCAL PROPERTY OWNERS SHOULD BE LIABLE FOR THESE COSTS BECAUSE THEY DID <br />0T CREATE THE PROBLEMS. THESE TWO LAND OWNERS PURCHASED THE PROPERTIES AFTER THE ORIGINAL <br />NING THAT CREATED THE PROBLEMS TOOK PLACE. BOTH OF THESE PROPERTY OWNERS ARE PRIVATE CITIZENS <br />WHO LIVE NEAR THE SITE AND HAVE MANY FRIENDS IN THE COMMUNITIES. IN RESPONSE TO COMMUNITY <br />COMMENTS ABOUT THE LOCAL PROPERTY OWNERS' POTENTIAL LIABILITIES FOR THEIR MINING PROPERTIES, EPA <br />REPRESENTATIVES HAVE HAD SEVERAL CONVERSATIONS WITH LOCAL OFFICIALS, RESIDENTS, AND THE PRESS TO <br />LISTEN TO CONCERNS AND PROVIDE INFORMATION. MUCH OF THE COMMUNITY CONCERN EXPRESSED AT THESE