My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2009-09-25_PERMIT FILE - M2009076 (41)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Minerals
>
M2009076
>
2009-09-25_PERMIT FILE - M2009076 (41)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 3:55:47 PM
Creation date
9/28/2009 3:07:52 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2009076
IBM Index Class Name
PERMIT FILE
Doc Date
9/25/2009
Doc Name
Big Five Tunnel Discharge
From
Venture Resources
To
DRMS
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• For additional information contact: <br />Mike Holmes, USEPA Region VIII„ (303) 312-6607 <br />Jim Lewis, CDPHE, (303) 692-3390 <br />SITE ffiSTORY, CUNTANMATfON. AND SELECTED REMEDY <br />The SITE is located on the east slope of Colorado's Front Range, approximately 30 miles west of <br />Denver. The water quality of Clear Creek and its tributaries is impaired by a legacy of historic <br />mining activities including the persistent drainage of low pH metals-laden water from numerous <br />mine tunnels. The Colorado Water Quality Control Commission classified Clear Creek as a Class I <br />cold water stream capable of protecting and maintaining a diversity of cold water biota. Clear Creek <br />has been out of compliance with stream standards set for this classification as a result of persistent <br />drainage from mine tunnels, mine waste piles, and tailings. These impacts have also reduced the <br />abundance and diversity of aquatic biota in the watershed. Table *1 attached to this ESD summarizes <br />the metals concentrations detected in discharge samples collected from the Big Five Tunnel during <br />the Phase I and Phase H Remedial Investigations, by CDPHE in 2001, and by UOS, an EPA START <br />Program contractor, in 2005. Discharge from the Big Five Tunnel is estimated to add 11,000 pounds <br />of metals per year to Clear Creek The table also includes State Drinking Water Standards for metals <br />and aquatic life standards for metals for comparison with the metals concentrations from the Big <br />Five discharge. Overall, the concentration of metals in the Big Five discharge exceeds the human <br />• health and aquatic life standards. <br />The SITE was selected for addition to the National Priorities List in September 1983 due to the <br />release of heavy metals to the environment. Since that time, EPA and CDPHE have conducted <br />investigations and made decisions regarding the implementation of response actions at specific <br />locations within the 400 square mile SITE boundary. Four RODS have been signed for the SITE. <br />The OU 1 ROD was signed September 30,1987, and called for passive treatment or a combination <br />of active and passive treatment for acid water draining from five mine tunnels. The five tunnels <br />include the Big Five and ARGO Tunnels in Idaho Springs, the Gregory Incline and National Tunnel <br />in Black Hawk, and the Quartz Hill Tunnel in Central City. <br />OU 2 was designated to address the mine waste piles in the immediate proximity to the five <br />discharging tunnels referenced above. The OU 2 ROD was signed on March 31, 1988. OU 4 was <br />designated to address the sources of contamination on the North Fork of Clear Creek. The OU 4 <br />ROD was signed September 29, 2004. <br />OU 3 was originally designated to address control of surge events of acid mine drainage from the <br />ARGO Tunnel. The signing of the OU 3 ROD was delayedpendingthe outcome of additional Phase <br />II investigations. In 1988, a Phase II Remedial Investigation (RI) was initiated to take a <br />comprehensive view of the approximately 400 square mile Clear Creek drainage basin. The OU 3 <br />ROD was signed on September 30,1991, and addressed the problems identified in the Phase 11 RI. <br />The OU 3 ROD superseded the original OU 1 ROD. The OU 2 ROD remained unchanged by the <br />• OU 3 ROD. The OU 3 ROD selected a combination of active treatment for the ARGO Tunnel, <br />passive treatment for the Burleigh Tunnel, collection of Virginia Canyon Ground Water for <br />treatment, provision of an alternate drinking water supply for users of contaminated ground water, <br />3
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.