Laserfiche WebLink
• Many faults, however, show evidence of repeated movements, some of which were quite different from the <br />dominant relative displacements, and some show evidence of small dip-slip movement. <br />The faults of the Idaho Springs district may be grouped according to strike into five principal sets, <br />which strike, respectively, north-west, northeast, east-northeast, east, and north. These sets show consistent <br />movement patterns, and some of the sets have other distinguishing characteristics. As stated, the northwest- <br />trending faults are inferred to have formed in Precambrian time and are called Precambrian (?) faults. The other <br />faults formed largely in early Tertiary time and are called Laramide faults. <br />FAULTS OF PRECAMBRIAN(?) AGE <br />Two major faults-the Idaho Springs fault and the J. L. Emerson-Gem fault system-as well as a few <br />lesser faults strike north-west. These faults are similar in trend and in many of their other characteristics to the <br />faults known as "breccia reefs" or "breccia dikes" (Lovering and Goddard, 1950, pls. 1 , 2; Lovering and <br />Tweto, 1953, p. 30). Previously, Lovering and Goddard (1950, p. 79-82) postulated that fractures of this set <br />formed during the Laramide orogeny, though they recognized that some may have followed pre-existing zones <br />of weakness. However, data summarized by Tweto and Sims (1963, p. 1001) suggest that these fractures formed <br />in Precambrian time and were reactivated during the Laramide orogeny. <br />The Idaho Springs fault strikes N. 50°-60° W. and dips steeply north. Regional mapping by Sims <br />(1964) in the Central City quadrangle has shown that the Idaho Springs fault extends a few miles northwest of <br />the Idaho Springs district, but the extent of the fault southeastward is not known. The Precambrian rocks on <br />opposite walls of the fault apparently have been displaced 500-600 feet by left-lateral movements (pl. 2), but <br />several Tertiary porphyritic dikes cross the fault without displacement, and one dike of quartz-monzonite <br />porphyry follows the course of the fault for more than a mile. The Cornucopia vein, which has a left-lateral <br />displacement of about 100 feet, may branch southeastward from the Idaho Springs fault. The Idaho Springs <br />• fault shows little other evidence of branching or "horsetailing." The fault is a broken zone, about 50 feet wide, <br />that has been well cemented with silica, some of which is chalcedonic, and that has been sparsely pyritized. <br />Locally, the silicified breccia stands as low walls on the surface, much like the "breccia reefs" described by <br />Lovering and Goddard (1950, p. 79). <br />The Idaho Springs fault shows evidence of repeated movements. Locally, it reopened in early Tertiary <br />time and was filled by sulfide and gangue minerals, such as those at the Waltham mine (pl. 1). Still later, minor <br />northwest-trending faults near the Idaho Springs fault displaced the early Tertiary veins, as in the Dover, <br />Lawrence L., and Syracuse mines. These relatively young fractures (faults) are typically gouge-lined and show <br />small right-lateral displacements, opposite to the dominant left-lateral movements on the Idaho Springs fault. <br />The J. L. Emerson-Gem fault system strikes N. 50°-80° W. and dips steeply northward. Regional <br />mapping by P. K. Sims (oral commun., 1960) has shown that the fault system continues north-west of the Idaho <br />Springs district, and mapping by Lovering and Goddard (1950, pl. 2) suggests that it may join the Floyd Hill <br />fault several miles to the southeast. In the Idaho Springs district the J. L. Emerson-Gem fault system contains <br />several interconnected branching faults (fig. 3) whose total displacement is not known. Except for mines that <br />mark its course, the fault system is inconspicuous at the surface, and it does not appreciably displace the <br />Precambrian rocks. In mine workings the fault system was found to be similar to the Idaho Springs fault, <br />containing as much as 30 feet of broken, silicified, and slightly pyritized rock. It was, however, much more <br />extensively reopened and mineralized than the Idaho Springs fault, for it contains some of the most productive <br />veins of the district. <br />FAULTS OF LARAMIDE AGE <br />Closely spaced Laramide faults form an interconnecting network of fractures that strike east, east- <br />northeast, and northeast. The faults cut all the early Tertiary intrusive rock types except the biotite-quartz latite- <br />the youngest intrusive rock. These faults probably originated about contemporaneously, for they show <br />consistent movement patterns that can be related to a simple compressional (or rotational) stress system. This <br />• interpretation is reinforced by the fact that the apparent order of formation of particular sets of faults is reversed <br />from place to place. East-trending faults in the north-east part of the district, in general, are cut by faults that, <br />16