Laserfiche WebLink
• older folds, the younger folds trend N. 55° E. in a remarkably consistent pattern. Only a few folds exceed 100 <br />feet in width, but even the small ones may be traced for long distances. Their plunge is extremely variable; it <br />ranges from nearly horizontal just south of Idaho Springs to steeply northeast in many places to the north. The <br />folds range in shape from structural terraces having nearly flat crests and steep northwest limbs to sharpcrested <br />chevron folds and, locally, to nearly isoclinal folds. East-facing monoclines are locally present on the southeast <br />limb of the Idaho Springs anticline. These shapes depend on the position of the minor folds on the Idaho <br />Springs anticline and their origin may be explained by differential movements in which the northwest sides <br />have been raised relative to the southeast sides (Moench and others, 1962). <br />Some of the large younger Precanibrian folds are shown in sections on plates 2 and 3. Plate 3 was <br />drawn from the map of the Big Five tunnel (Moench and Drake, 1966, fig. 6) and the geologic map of the <br />district (Moench, 1964, pl. 1). The largest younger folds in the Big Five tunnel are exposed. in biotite gneiss <br />between the Hudson( ?) and Shafter veins (pl. 3). On the tunnel level these folds are sharp-crested chevrons that <br />have intricately crinkled opposing limbs. This is the most common shape of the younger folds in the district. <br />The microcline gneiss, in contrast with the biotite gneiss, has been sheared on northwest-dipping fracture <br />surfaces but has not been folded. This relationship has been observed at several places at the surface where the <br />younger folds in the biotite gneiss were traced to the contact with the microcline gneiss but were not traced <br />farther beyond. <br />Small folds and lineations of many types are related to the larger younger Precambrian folds. Small <br />crinkles that are parallel to the younger fold axes are abundant in the folded biotite gneiss, and biotite and <br />sillimanite have recrystallized locally along the younger fold axes. In addition, slickenside striae, rodding, and, <br />locally, small folds and crinkles, consistently bear about N. 25° W. or S. 250 E. on the limbs of the younger <br />folds that bear N. 55° E. The slickensides and rodding that bear N. 250 W. and S. 25°E. as well as the small drag <br />folds that bear N. 55° E. were formed largely by slippage of successively higher beds toward the larger <br />anticlines. In many outcrops the lineations of both the older and the younger fold systems are well preserved. <br />• The younger folds clearly bend and deflect the older lineations. <br />FAULTS <br />Faults are abundant and closely spaced in the Idaho Springs district and form a complex intersecting <br />pattern. With few exceptions the faults were mineralized with sulfide and gangue minerals in early Tertiary <br />time, forming the veins shown on plate 1. To eliminate distortions of the pattern due to topographic relief, the <br />major veins and faults were projected to a horizontal plane of 9,000 feet (fig. 3). <br />The faults of the Idaho Springs district formed in two different periods of fracturing. During the first <br />period, probably in Precambrian time (Tweto and Sims, 1963, p. 1001), two prominent and a few lesser <br />northwest-trending faults were produced. The second period of fracturing produced an anastomosing pattern of <br />north-east, east-northeast, and east-striking faults. These faults cut all but the youngest of the Tertiary intrusive <br />rocks, most of which were intruded along joints (not along earlier faults), and probably formed in early Tertiary <br />time. A few east- to northeast-striking faults having unusually flat dips, however, may have formed in response <br />to the major Precambrian (?) faulting. In addition, a few short north-trending faults of small displacement <br />appear to have formed later than the second major stage of faulting. Evidence from other parts of the Front <br />Range, however, indicates that some of the north-trending faults may have had their inception during <br />Precambrian time. <br />Most of the faults are inconspicuous in outcrops, and it is very likely that many more exist than are <br />shown on plate 1. Those that had well-developed gossans were prospected in the early stages of mining in the <br />district and are now marked by rows of prospect pits and shafts. Many faults are narrow, gouge-lined slip <br />surfaces that are subparallel to the layering of the rocks and are not obvious in the outcrops. If it were not for <br />the sulfide ores they contain, the abundance and extent of the faults probably would not have been recognized. <br />Most of the faults dip northward at medium to steep angles, have dominant, strike-slip displacements, <br />• and are right or left lateral. These terms refer to the apparent relative movements of the two walls when viewed <br />in plan; right lateral indicates clockwise movement, and left lateral indicates counterclockwise movement. <br />15