My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2009-09-25_REPORT - C1996084
>
Day Forward
>
Report
>
Coal
>
C1996084
>
2009-09-25_REPORT - C1996084
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 3:55:48 PM
Creation date
9/25/2009 3:29:01 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1996084
IBM Index Class Name
REPORT
Doc Date
9/25/2009
Doc Name
4th Quarter 2008 Inspection of Excess Spoil Fill Reports
From
Peak Project Management, LLC
To
DRMS
Permit Index Doc Type
Mine Inflow Reports
Email Name
KAG
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />INSPECTION OF EXCESS SPOIL FILL <br />Fourth Quarter 2008 Certification <br />Fill Area No. 9 <br />Date: December 29, 2008 <br />GENERAL DESCRIPTION OR REFERENCE TO SITE PLAN: <br />The CTL Thompson report dated April 27, 2001, "Stability Analysis and Geo-technical Recommendations <br />Lorencito Surface Mine Phase I" addresses the general requirements as also cited in Sections 4.09.1 to <br />4.09.2 of the Colorado Mined Land Reclamation Board for Coal Mining. <br />ACTIVITY DURING INSPECTION: <br />Removal of Topsoil and Organic Matter <br />Placement of Under-drains <br />Installation of Surface Drainage System <br />-Construction of Fill <br />-Placement of Topsoil <br />-Seeding <br />X Other __Facilityidle_..__ ,- <br />SEDIMENT CONTROL <br />Sediment pond construction has been completed in accordance with plans submitted to and approved by the <br />DMG and as-constructed survey/drawings certified by Registered Land Surveyor and Registered <br />Professional Engineer. All surface run-off from the fill areas is directed to this sediment control facility <br />known as pond 9A. No discharge occurred during the quarter. <br />SURFACE DRAINAGE <br />Armored Ditches line the east and west boundary of the fill area. Lateral ditches on the fill face direct <br />runoff to these side ditches. No erosional problems were noted at the intersections of the lateral ditches and <br />the armored ditches. The main access road across the mine disturbance area was relocated and now crosses <br />along the crest of fill 9. A concrete culvert was installed at the head of the west down drain at the point <br />where the road crosses the drainage. <br />SITE PREPARATION <br />As indicated by previous inspection reports, organic materials such as brush and trees were removed from <br />the proposed fill area followed by topsoil removal prior to fill placement. Design criteria did not require <br />keyway cuts for steeper valleys with minimal soil cover (fill #9). No evidence of springs or seeps was <br />observed during site preparation. <br />DRAINAGE SYSTEM (UNDERDRAINS) <br />Drain sizes are specified by CDMG regulations for fills which can be classified as Valley Fills. Fill area #9 <br />is not a valley fill. CTL Thompson recommended a minimum 6' x 12' triangular section (area = 64 SF) for <br />this size fill. As indicated by previous inspection reports, as constructed drainages generally were more <br />trapezoidal with a top width of 121, bottom width of 8', and average height of 8' (area = 80 SF). Sandstone <br />recovered from durable "channel" sandstone deposits encountered during the mining process were used in <br />drain construction. Miraff 160 fabric was used ui lieu of filter naawrial.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.