My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2007-06-19_REVISION - C1981018 (2)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Coal
>
C1981018
>
2007-06-19_REVISION - C1981018 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 3:17:30 PM
Creation date
9/18/2009 10:26:48 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981018
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
6/19/2007
Doc Name
Response to Corrected Letter (Emailed)
From
Scott Wanstedt
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
TR64
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Page 1 of 1 <br />Gorham, Kent <br /> <br />From: Scott Wanstedt [sanstedt@deserado.com] <br />Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2007 4:00 PM <br />To: Gorham, Kent <br />Subject: RE: TR-64 correct letter <br />Kent, <br />The following are in response to the letter attached to your email: <br />1. The entire permit area has been surveyed for cultural resources. An excerpt <br />from Map 3 is attached showing the area affected by TR-64 in Section 28, T.3N., <br />R.101 E. All known cultural resources, even isolate finds (IF), are avoided by the <br />proposed disturbances. <br />BLM has traditionally provided extensive review of the proposed activities in light of <br />cultural resources. Their staff archeologist reviews all proposals and provides <br />comments as necessary. <br />We can provide DMG with a duplicate of Map 3 to hold as confidential material. <br />2. Active drill sites are covered by the SAE titled `Typical Degasification <br />Borehole, Ventilation Shaft, Return Shaft, Rock Dust Shaft, and Exploration Hole <br />Pad Areas' found in Illustration 44. Reclaimed drill sites are coved by the SAE <br />demonstrations you mentioned. <br />The bonding cost estimate appears adequate. <br />Thanks. <br />Scott Wanstedt <br />From: Gorham, Kent [mailto:Kent.Gorham@state.co.us] <br />Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2007 1:58 PM <br />To: Scott Wanstedt <br />Subject: TR-64 correct letter <br />Try this one... please email your responses along with any issues on the cost estimate and we will move ahead <br />towards approval. Thanks. <br />Kent Gorham <br />Division of Reclamation, Mining, and Safety <br />Colorado Department of Natural Resources <br />303-866-4931 <br />6/19/2007
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.