Laserfiche WebLink
• boundary of the M-1983-141 permitted disturbance was modified to include this <br />escape raise. Please refer to Page 3, Section 16(b) of the September 15, 2006 <br />AM-2 Adequacy Response -specifically: "The Mount Royale Escapeway <br />closure is consistent with Standard Drawing No. 2 - Hollow Core Shaft <br />Closure", and to the Maps, Exhibit(s) E-1, E-2(A), and E-2(B). The text of this <br />submittal clearly discussed the inclusion of this feature and the attached <br />mapping of the proposed permit boundary clearly showed this feature within the <br />permit boundary. <br />This item is a direct result of interference by M. Steen which I personally view <br />as a violation of MRV's rights under the operating (Joint Venture) agreement <br />between Global Minerals, Ltd. (MRV's parent company) and the Property <br />Owners (which certainly includes Steen). Please review paragraphs 7.2 and 7.3 <br />of the agreement between Global the Property Owners. <br />Also, please review paragraph 7.6(b) of this same document, which is included <br />in this report as Exhibit II "Operating Agreement". <br />I will further address the "Steen Inane Nonsense" at the end of this treatise. <br />PB-3-1 There are a number of water management issues that are not adequately <br />described or addressed in the reclamation permit. <br />• 1) What are the permit nos. assigned by the Division of Water Resources (State <br />Engineer) for the wells at location CM-4... <br />MRV notes that the DRMS permit, which dates to 1983, has been reviewed <br />many times by the DRMS, including during the most recent permit amendment. <br />The wells at CM-4 consist on one abandoned well which never contacted the <br />ground water (Cash Mine mine pool) and was abandoned by a previous <br />operator, and the existing monitoring well that was discussed in the AM2 <br />amendment hydrology review and at length in the subsequent TR06 "Non-DMO <br />Designation and Water Monitoring Plan". <br />These bores were constructed and completed by a prior operator. As part of the <br />process of bringing the entire site into full regulatory compliance, Adrian <br />Brown Consultants, Inc. (Adrian Brown) submitted Form GWS-45 for this on <br />November 3, 2006. The State Engineer's Office (SEO), specifically Mr. Jeff <br />Deatheridge, informed Adrian Brown and MRV that in accordance with C.R.S. <br />§ 37-90-137(7) - 7(a) "No well permits shall be required unless the <br />nontributary ground water being removed will be beneficially used". It is <br />MRV's position that this is exactly the case. <br />No sealing or disinfection requirements have been issued. <br />0