My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2009-03-06_PERMIT FILE - C1981012A (6)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Coal
>
C1981012
>
2009-03-06_PERMIT FILE - C1981012A (6)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/11/2017 9:39:10 AM
Creation date
8/4/2009 11:01:08 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981012A
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
3/6/2009
Section_Exhibit Name
Exhibit 22 NPDES Permit
Media Type
D
Archive
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
94
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CO-0000906 <br />New Elk Mine Water Quality Assessment <br />the New es had Elk Mine O nt all <br />The ratio of the low flow of the Middle Fork of the Purgatoire River to <br />• 001 design flow is 0.77:1. The nearest upstream and downstream lit the <br />are relat'? ely lirmited, to the small <br />assimilative capacities available to the New Elk Mine Outfa <br />available dilution, analyses indicate that assimilative cap c te <br />the Left Fork of Apache Canyon Creek has a low <br />According to available and historical information, <br />Howevon BM <br />flow of zero. The New Elk Mine Outfall 009 as well as disch ogees a he Canyon h Creeke <br />Project (COG-900007) are known point source contributors p <br />despite nearby contributions, the findings of this assessment indicate that there is no dilution in the <br />Left Fork of Apache Canyon Creek and therefore assimilative ffluent discharge. are equal to the in-stream <br />standards applied to the New Elk Mine Outfall 009 e <br />the Division, <br />Information used in this assessment includes data gathered from the New Elk Mine, <br />Riverwatch, the U. S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), the <br />consist olf gthe ic best iey (USG), <br />and the U.S. Census Bureau. The data used in the assessment available at the time of preparation of this WQA analysis. <br />II. Water Quality <br />The New Elk Mine Outfall 001 discharges to the Water Body Identification (WBID) stream ssgmeennt River <br />basin <br />trea CO?,RLAOSa, which means the Arkansas River B esin,e t as liedainsTable A Sub-was found in the <br />• Segment 05a. The composition description of this s gm <br />regulations at the time of preparation of this WQA• However, oere rRiverIwlas originally proposed to fall <br />description is incorrect, as the Middle Fork of the Pu g <br />under this segment but translation errors were made from the final regulations during transposition <br />by the Water Quality Control Commission. Because corrections to the segment description are <br />intended to be finalized prior to the issuance of this permit, this WQA is being prepared based on the <br />soon to be corrected segment description, which falling <br />AquaticrL fe Class It <br />COARLA05a. Stream segment COARLA05a is <br />Class E Exisiting Primary Contact Use, Water Supply and Agriculture. <br />The New Elk Mine Outfall 009 discharges to the Water Body Identification (WBID) stream ssgmeennt <br />COARLA06, which means the Arkansas River Basin, Lower Arkansas River Sub-basin, <br />Segment 06. This segment is composed of "All tributaries to the Purgatoire River, including all <br />wetlands, lakes and reservoirs, from the source to Interstate 25, except for specific listings in <br />segments 4, 5a and 5b." Stream segment COARLA06 is classified for Cold Water Aquatic Life <br />Class 2, Class E Exisiting Primary Contact Use and Agriculture. <br />Basic Standards have been developed in Section 31.11(2) and (3) of The Basic Standards <br />and Methodologies for Surface Water to protect the waters of the state from radionuclides and <br />organic chemicals. In Section 31.11(1) of the regulations, narrative standards are applied to any <br />pollutant of concern, even where there is no numeric standard for that pollutant. Waters of the state <br />shall be "free from harmful substances in harmful amounts." Total dissolved solids (TDS), and <br />sediment are such pollutants of concern being discussed by Agricultural and Water Quality Standards <br />• workgroups. In order to protect the Basic Standards in waters of the state, effluent limitations with <br />Appendix A (wQn version s-acFASL» Page 3 of 29 Last Revised August 26, 2008
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.