My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2009-07-15_REVISION - M1980244 (23)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1980244
>
2009-07-15_REVISION - M1980244 (23)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/15/2021 5:52:22 PM
Creation date
7/21/2009 11:01:54 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1980244
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
7/15/2009
Doc Name
QA Mon. & Test Results Load Out- Bin Location
From
CC&V
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
AM9
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
31
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
J <br />• <br />Cripple Creek & Victor Gold Mining Company <br />Cresson Project <br />Quality Assurance Monitoring and Test Results <br />Load Out Bin Relocation <br />July 7, 2009 <br />ameO <br />AMEC recorded observations made during seaming. For the lower geomembrane layer, the <br />fusion-welding summary is presented in Appendix J-3, and the extrusion-welding summary is <br />presented in Appendix J-4. <br />6.1.4 Defect and Repair Observations <br />AMEC inspected geomembrane panels for damage that may have occurred during <br />manufacture, transport, deployment, or installation as discussed in Section 5. AMEC repeatedly <br />observed all panels and seams for defects until Ames covered the geomembrane with DCF. <br />AMEC documented defects by assigning a unique defect identification code to each defect, and <br />marking each defect code on the geomembrane. The summaries of defects, repairs, and <br />non-destructive testing of repairs, including the approximate locations of each repair are <br />presented in Appendix J-5. <br />6.1.5 Destructive Testing <br />AMEC selected destructive test locations based on Lonestar's completion of geomembrane <br />welding, various working conditions, and on seaming observations (e.g., suspicion of a defective <br />weld). Lonestar obtained and tested 6 fusion seam destructive samples and 2 extrusion seam <br />destructive samples during the installation of the geomembrane in the LOB. <br />Lonestar constructed approximately 2,876 lineal feet of fusion welded seams and 113 lineal feet <br />of extrusion welded seams on the LOB geomembrane. The specified frequency of destructive <br />testing was one test per 500 lineal feet of weld. AMEC identified and Lonestar obtained <br />destructive samples from the geomembrane panel seams at a frequency of one destructive test <br />sample per 480 lineal feet of fusion welded seams, and one per 57 lineal feet of extrusion <br />welded seams. The test frequencies exceeded project requirements. <br />Field destructive testing of seams consisted of testing ten 1-inch wide coupons, five of which <br />were tested for peel, and five of which were tested for shear. Lonestar tested the inside and <br />outside tracks of the fusion welds for peel. Lonestar performed all destructive tests on-site <br />using a field tensiometer, and AMEC observed and documented all tests. <br />The specified acceptance criteria for 80-mil smooth and 100-mil single sided texture LLDPE <br />shear tests was that four of the five coupons tested must have an ultimate strength of at least <br />120 and 130 pounds (respectively) per pulling inch (ppi) prior to yield. The specified acceptance <br />criteria for peel tests was that four of the five coupons tested must have ultimate strength of at <br />• least 100 ppi and achieve a Film Tear Bond (FTB) upon breaking. All destructive fusion seam <br />and extrusion seam samples met specifications. <br />S1PROJECTS\1125E CCV CQA\H3 - CONSTRUCTION\LOB CERT REPORT\REPORT BODY\LOB CERT REPORT 2009.07.07.DOC 21
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.