Laserfiche WebLink
Cripple Creek & Victor Gold Mining Company <br />Cresson Project ameO <br />Quality Assurance Monitoring and Test Results <br />Load Out Bin Relocation <br />July 7, 2009 <br />6.1.3.1 Trial Seam Monitoring <br />Lonestar performed trial seams to monitor the performance of the seaming apparatus and <br />operator under actual site conditions. Each welding operator and his apparatus produced trial <br />seams prior to the beginning of each day's seaming operation and in the event that devices <br />were disconnected from power and re-energized. <br />Lonestar cut 1-inch wide samples (coupons) from each trial seam and tested the coupons with a <br />field tensiometer. Lonestar tested each double wedge fusion trial seam twice for peel adhesion <br />(peel) and once for bonded seam strength (shear). Lonestar conducted peel tests on fusion <br />welds on both the inner and outer tracks of each peel coupon. Lonestar tested each extrusion <br />trial seam twice for peel and once for shear. <br />AMEC personnel observed the testing of trial seam samples and documented test results. <br />AMEC observed the tensile testing of each trial seam coupon to verify that project yield <br />strengths were met during shear testing and that failure did not occur in the weld during peel <br />testing. When trial seams did not meet specifications, AMEC verified that the welding apparatus <br />was not used until two consecutive trial seams performed by the same technician/apparatus <br />combination met specifications. The trial seam test results for extrusion and fusion seaming are <br />presented in Appendix J-2. Lonestar used two tensiometers during the project. Tensiometer <br />certifications are presented in Appendix L. Figures 3 and 4 show the codes used to designate <br />passing and failing test results. <br />It should be noted that on April 26, 2009, two trial seams were completed prior to starting work <br />and seam welding did not start until 45-55 minutes after the trial seams were completed. This <br />did not occur during panel deployment and occurred during capping and patch repair work. All <br />seams were tested and passed <br />6.1.3.2 Seaming Observations <br />AMEC personnel observed seams before, during and after welding. AMEC checked each seam <br />for adequate overlap prior to seaming and to verify that the seam area was clean and dry. <br />AMEC documented Lonestar personnel performing the seaming and the seaming equipment <br />used. Following the completion of seaming and routine repairs, AMEC checked the full length <br />of each seam to verify that no additional repairs were required. In the event that additional <br />repairs were needed, AMEC marked the location requiring repair on the geomembrane, <br />documented the location, and brought the repair area to the attention of Lonestar. Once <br />Lonestar made repairs, AMEC checked the repair location to verify completion. AMEC <br />inspected all seams for quality and completion. AMEC personnel conducted a final <br />• walk-through to verify completion of the entire geomembrane system and to identify any <br />additional damage that may have occurred during construction operations. <br />SAPROJECTS11125E CCV CQAIH3 - CONSTRUCTIONILOB CERT REPORTIREPORT BODYILOB CERT REPORT 2009.07.07.DOC 20