My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2008-12-10_REVISION - C1981010
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Coal
>
C1981010
>
2008-12-10_REVISION - C1981010
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 3:38:46 PM
Creation date
7/21/2009 9:33:39 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981010
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
12/10/2008
Doc Name
Trapper G-Pit Landslide Mining Assesment
From
Agapito Associates Inc
Type & Sequence
PR6
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
66
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
January 15. 2008 <br />FLAG (Version 5.00) <br />¦ <br />¦ <br />¦ <br />Page 3 <br />Figure 19. Contours of Velocity at Equilibrium for 1.31-1:1 V Slope Angle and 30-ft-high <br />Pile Under Saturated Residual Strength Condition for Q-Floor Mudstone <br />Bedding Dipping at 25° (Note: velocities less than H fps arc considered <br />negligible and in equilibrium) <br />4.5 Spoil Pile Recommendations <br />It is recommended that spoil pile be constructed so as not to exceed a maximum fill <br />height of 68 ft above the toe and that the spoil pile slope face not exceed a 1.3 horizontal-to- <br />vertical ratio in areas where the average bedding slope is about 13°. This recommendation is <br />thought to be conservative. especially during dry periods. because a low strength for the Q-Floor <br />mudstone was assumed and no cohesion was assumed for the spoils. <br />'T'here are uncertainties in this analysis that need to be considered when implementing <br />these design recommendations, especially regarding bedding dip compared to bedding strength. <br />and groundwater effects. The analysis assumed the strength of the Q-Floor bedding was 01 = 15° <br />softening to 5° at residual. The 13° bedding dip represents an average, but there are locations <br />within K-111t where the beds are more steeply dipping (up to 15°). If the beds dip more steeply <br />than the frictional strength of the beds then the spoils will be unstable, creeping or sliding down <br />hill. In such areas. there are two design alternatives: <br />Associates. Inc.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.