My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2008-12-10_REVISION - C1981010
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Coal
>
C1981010
>
2008-12-10_REVISION - C1981010
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 3:38:46 PM
Creation date
7/21/2009 9:33:39 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981010
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
12/10/2008
Doc Name
Trapper G-Pit Landslide Mining Assesment
From
Agapito Associates Inc
Type & Sequence
PR6
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
66
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
J117711cr?•v 15. 008 <br />FMC (Version 5.00) <br />¦ <br />¦ <br />¦ <br />PeWe 31 <br />Figure 18. Contours of Velocity at Equilibrium for 13HAV Slope Angle and 68-ft-high <br />Pile Under Saturated Residual Strength Condition for Q-Floor Mudstone <br />Bedding Dipping at 13° (Note: velocities less than 10, Ips are considered <br />negligible and in equilibrium) <br />For the case when the bedding is more steeply dipping, 68 N of spoil is unstable. The <br />spoil needs to have improved properties. This was examined by case #5 where the bedding dip <br />was increased to 25° and compaction was assumed for the spoils. The 25° is beyond the <br />maximum bedding dip but the analysis provides an upper-bound limit to stability. Case 95c <br />indicates that a 30 It high spoil pile is at the limit of equilibrium when the spoils have a strength <br />of 50 psi' cohesion and friction is reduced to 38° (no cohesion reduction was assumed). The <br />predicted failure mode was again determined from high velocities and shear strain increments. <br />Contours ofvelocity, shown in Figure 19, show the unstable volume. The 38° friction and 50 psf <br />cohesion used tier this limit ofequilibrium condition was compared to the assumed spoil strength <br />of 40° friction and and 50 psf cohesion to compute the safety factor of FOS = 1.07 using <br />Equation 8. <br />Agapito Associates, Inc.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.