Laserfiche WebLink
In 1986 a debris flow at the site displaced the Bear No. 3 Mine fan. In 1993 the area of the <br />access road immediately below the fan slid, dropping the upper road approximately six <br />feet. It is not known if the debris flows were reactivated by mining activity. Bear Coal <br />Company has performed subsidence monitoring quarterly with reports submitted semi- <br />annually. As provided for in the permit application, monitoring stopped two years after the <br />reclamation of the road. <br />The study by Rocky Mountain Geotechnical indicates that mining of the C-Seam would <br />result in propagation of fractures upward through the geologic section for approximately <br />360 feet. Strata between the C-Seam and the massive sandstone at the top of the lower coal <br />bearing member would be rubbilized to some degree. No rubbilization of the overlying E- <br />and F-Seams was expected to occur. Subsidence of the land surface was expected to a <br />maximum of six to eight feet in the northwestern part of the mine. <br />The permit application required that the operator conduct subsidence monitoring of each <br />mined panel, beginning just prior to retreat mining of that panel. Subsidence monitoring of <br />that panel would continue for a period of two years after retreat mining had occurred. The <br />concern was that the subsidence effects might cause landslides or reinitiate historic <br />landslides. With the cessation of mining in 1996, there was no more subsidence monitoring <br />above mined panels at the Bear No. 3 Mine. <br />The subsidence monitoring results confirmed the conclusions of the subsidence predictions. <br />The maximum and minimum predicted subsidence values corresponded satisfactorily with <br />the maximum and minimum observed subsidence values. Observed subsidence values <br />ranged from negligible to about 6 feet. Shortly after retreat mining underneath the <br />subsidence monuments began, subsidence commenced. The elevations of most of the <br />subsidence monuments decreased steadily although, for a few stations, the rate of change in <br />elevation varied. Subsidence of the monuments generally stopped within about a year or so <br />after retreat mining stopped under that monument. <br />It was predicted that subsidence would have, at most, a small effect on landslides in the <br />area but that there would not be any long term impacts. The subsidence monitoring <br />observations demonstrated that landslides were not initiated by the effects of subsidence <br />and that there were no long term impacts. <br />The mining operation is in compliance with the provisions of this section with the <br />stipulations. <br />XVI. Concurrent Surface and Underground Mining <br />This section does not apply to the Bear Coal Company permit. <br />XVII. Operations on Alluvial Valley Floors <br />Information describing alluvial valley floors (AVFs) in the study area is located in Section 2.06.8 <br />of the Bear No. 3 permit application. The alluvial valley floor findings made by the Division for <br />the Mountain Coal Company's West Elk Mine are directly applicable to the Bear No. 3 Mine. <br />The Bear No. 3 Mine permit area and hydrologically adjacent areas were included in the <br />Mountain Coal Company AVF survey area. <br />No AVFs are located within the Bear No. 3 Mine permit boundary. The only part of the <br />permit or hydrologically adjacent area identified as alluvial deposits are adjacent to the <br />25