My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2009-06-08_REVISION - C1981010
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Coal
>
C1981010
>
2009-06-08_REVISION - C1981010
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 3:47:26 PM
Creation date
6/8/2009 12:59:33 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981010
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
6/8/2009
Doc Name
Response to Adequacy Comments from DRMS dated 5/7/2009 Letter
From
Trapper Mining Inc
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
PR6
Email Name
JDM
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
4. Division's Comment: It is noted that the Air Pollution Control Division Permit <br />11MF253-1 was modified and issued November 7, 2008. Per Rule 2.03.1, please <br />provide an update to PR-6 submittal page 1-9 to reflect the recently issued permit. <br />Trapper's Response: As requested, Table 1.2-1 was updated to include the most <br />recent modifications to APCD Permit 11MF253-1 and also updates the page with <br />the removal of any reference to APCD Permit 13MF169. Please note that Permit <br />11MF253-1 was updated on May 8, 2009 and now incorporates former Permit <br />13MF169 (Utility Ash and Sludge Disposal). Permit 11MF253-1 is now a combined <br />surface mining and utility ash and sludge disposal permit. The updated permit page <br />1-9 is enclosed. <br />5. Division's Comment: Un-numbered pages discussing Horse Gulch Fill and K/G <br />Buttress Fill provided in PR-6 submittal contain information concerning a <br />description of the proposed fills. Please incorporate the un-numbered pages into the <br />Trapper Mine Permit per Rule 2.05.3(6)(b). The description should include <br />descriptions of the geotechnical investigations, design, construction, operation, <br />maintenance and removal of the proposed fills as applicable. <br />Trapper's Response: A discussion of the construction of the Horse Gulch Fill and <br />the Buttress Fill is included on the attached revised permit text pages 3-40, 3-40a <br />and 3-40b. <br />6. Division's Comment: Based on Appendix A of the Agapito Report entitled Horse <br />Gulch Fill Stability Analysis, December 2008 (The Report), the Horse Gulch Fill is a <br />valley fill by definition. Per Rule 1.04(148), a valley fill "means a fill structure <br />consisting of any material other than coal waste or organic material that is placed in a <br />valley where the side slopes of the existing valley, measured at the steepest poing are <br />greater than 20 degrees or the average of the profile of the valley from the toe of the fill <br />to the top is greater than 10 degrees': Appendix A, Horse Gulch General <br />Arrangement, shows three areas highlighted in yellow that exceed 35% slope (19.17 <br />degrees). Preliminary calculations indicate an average slope for the drainage profile <br />of 8.6% (4.5 degrees). Given that some side slope areas are represented as exceeding <br />a 19 degree slope, Horse Gulch Fill meets the requirements of a valley fill... <br />Therefore the requirements of 4.09.1 and 4.09.2 apply. Please discuss whether you <br />agree with this determination. It may be determined that Horse Gulch Fill may meet <br />the definition of a head of hollow fill in which case the additional requirements of <br />4.09.3 may also apply... Please discuss your position as to whether or not Horse <br />Gulch Fill may also meet the definition of a head of hollow fill. <br />Trapper's Response: Trapper believes that the Horse Gulch Fill meets the definition <br />of a head of hollow fill. Trapper will incorporate an underdrain instead of the <br />alternative chimney drain noted under 4.09.3(1). <br />7. Division's Comment: Page 23 of the Horse Gulch Fill Stability Report states that <br />there will be no need to channel storm runoff away from the fill once the fill is <br />constructed. The Division does not agree with this statement. Small areas south of <br />the fill will flow north toward the fill and require channels designed for the 1.00
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.