My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2009-06-01_REVISION - C1982057
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Coal
>
C1982057
>
2009-06-01_REVISION - C1982057
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 3:47:09 PM
Creation date
6/3/2009 10:36:33 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1982057
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
6/1/2009
Doc Name
Midterm Adequacy Responses
From
DRMS
To
Seneca Coal Company
Type & Sequence
TR62
Email Name
DTM
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
TR-62 3"? ROUND ADEQUACY REVIEW <br />a. The ?iv?sion requested a?r?ended narrative and data reference addressing water <br />quality suitability for the ??? srxn haw that would be used to repl?aee the <br />n??ned out ad?udleated springs on tl?e P`rederich praperty. In respane, the <br />aperatar pravided amended narrative an Tab 1 page 11, referencing water <br />quality ca?nparison ? the subject spring discharge to +I?PI?E surface water <br />ag?•zcultural standards fan ??? 1 of the ??$ Annual Plydralagy Repast far <br />Seneca II-?. The amended Tab 1 ? narrative Hates that na e.ceedances of <br />agricultural water qua?it have ?oecurred, "demanstratng that this water would be <br />safe far livestacl? watering" <br />The twa springs that flaw intt? Pand ?I are designated -? ??? French <br />I?ran?, and pail spring ?t?neasured at Pond 1 GA inlet culve??t?. The quality and <br />how data presented in the Z??? AHI for these springs appear to carrespand to the <br />summary ?nforat?en in the amended narrative, and the quality wa?uld appear to <br />he suitable far livestack watering. These springs are bath included in the <br />approved llydralagic monitoring plan far annual n?onztc?ring of disha.rge and <br />water quality. <br />we are awaiting response frar? the office of tl?e Mate engineer regarding this <br />natter and €?ther water rights related. issues, ?an.d we will advise you of any <br />concerns or requests they nay have, upon receipt ?autside of the TR??? scope of <br />review. The issue of water ? fights replace?ner?t i11 n?e? t?o ?e addressed in the <br />future as a part of the hydrologic evaluation far Phan III band release <br />Monitoring of tl?e subs ect springs will need to be continued until final bond <br />release, and the rnanitoring data. will need to be evaluated in tl?e hand ?•elease <br />application, in part to doeurr?ent compliance with Mule .I 5, <br />For the purposes of TR-??, this ?te?n i? considered to be res?alved, <br />5?. The I?tvisian requested that the operator provide a ??? update to Apper?di? ??-3, <br />to include reference to ca?x?pleted and continuing aspen?woody Plant studies, <br />along with a brief summary of the findings of said reports. Theappendix was <br />amended as requested. Item Resnlved. <br />Via. The I?1v1s1on r+eclueted the operator to correct an editorial error on ?a?nended Page <br />-.1. Tl?e narrative was amended as requested. Item Resolved <br />Ce, The Dx?s?an requested commitment to Provide landowner written requests far <br />retention of proposed permanent structures such as fet'cin and powerlines. <br />responded, in essence, that the requested camt??tment had prevlausl?r been <br />included in a revised cover sheet to Attacl?t?nent ?3-. After ?+e-cl?ecl?ing the <br />Previous submittal, we cancer that the necessary camm?tment has been provided. <br />Item. Resolved, <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.