Laserfiche WebLink
STATE OF COLORADO <br />I?M1J15??]?I ? ?,E+?AATI?]N, ?ll?![N?G ABED SAFETY <br />C?e??rtn?ent cif N?tur?l Re?aurces <br />1.1.3 Sherman fit., R?or? X15 <br />Denver, C???rac?a 8???3 <br />I'f?c?r7eo ?3[?3? ?+6?-367 <br />FAQ; ?303? 82-81 ?? <br />June l , ?+?? <br />?.+??AL <br />I?IVB ?Itz?l? ?F <br />CLAA7't?l <br />N?I?1 <br />SAFETY <br />Bill fitter, Jr. <br />?a?v'ern€?r <br />?.? ?ar? <br />i-larri? D. ?her??an <br />Seneca ?..??? o??an?, ?L ?xeeutive (?irect?r <br />??'?. ??} ??? f??naf?f `'vV. Cottony <br />aydet?, '? 0 ?' E?ivisi?n f?irector <br />Nat?r?l Res?ur?:e Trt??tee <br />?..E: +eneca II-' 1'?ine ??e?it I"?I?. -1'??a{17? <br />Te+?hr?ic?? evisiort o. +? QTR-?? <br />i?dte?r R?s?or?s?s <br />dear ll??r, Karp: <br />The ?}?vi?i?n ? revle?ed the TR-?Z adequacy re??ne and amended ??at?rial? ?r?u <br />ub??itted under aver lettex• dated Mai ??, ??}?, and e l?a?e determined that the <br />ubl?ittal adequately add?°e?e? the def c?enc?e? ?dent? ed in our letter cif A?r1i ?, ?4?. <br />?. result, vie mill pra?ceed with ?ua?ce of ? pre??Sed decllon t? ap?prQVe T'?-?. fur <br />ItI171?ed reVl'l?4' ?+?n1?1?t5 ?I"? ?17C?e. <br />In order to clan# certain i??ue pertaining to mater ri,h? fie.. ?'riede??ch ran, <br />permanent i?n?au?.dn?ent, and the h?? 'ells, floe ?iviSier? hay requested comment and <br />ad?ien?ent ?r"om tl?e ?~?ice ?ofthc Mate nnccr, fee Ite??? :?, c, end ?d, ?f??r ?r?l <br />3 ? letter. eolut?on of then mater r?ht5 related conce? mill be pursued o?uts?de the <br />c+?ntext of T.-, <br />Please contact one i#you have any questions. <br />SincerEly, <br />??? <br />Davie .Mathews <br />Environmental Protection Specialist <br />C: Denver File <br />C?fficc of C?f?ice ? <br />Mined Land Reela?atian aer?ver ? brand Junction • Durango Active axod Inactive N?ne?