Laserfiche WebLink
Section 4 <br />Potential for Rock to be Toxic-Forming <br />Comparison to Refined Site Specific Criterion for Arsenic to Site Concentrations: Wh.enlthe <br />RMC estimated for arsenic (37 mg/kg) is adjusted assuming a bioavailability factor of 63%, the <br />resulting site-specific RMC is 59 mg/kg. The site-specific criterion for arsenic of 59 mg/kg is <br />higher than any total arsenic reported from development rock samples. The highest <br />concentration of arsenic found in the development rock at the Sunday-mines, 18.81 mg/ kg, <br />which is less than one third of the site-specific criterion. Therefore, based on the'measured <br />concentrations of arsenic and the calculated criteria protective of workers, development rock at <br />the Sunday Group mines is not expected to be a toxic-forming material. <br />4.1.3 Evaluation of Inorganic Constituents not Addressed by BUVI <br />BLM RMCs have not been identified for several metals detected alt the Sunday Mines Group <br />including uranium. In order to assess the potential toxicity of these metals in development rock <br />and ore, EPA Regional Screening Levels (RSLs; EPA 2009) for a commercial/ industrial exposure <br />scenario were utilized as screening level concentrations for the following metals to assess if <br />development rock and ore are a potential toxic producing material: aluminum, barium, <br />beryllium, boron, chromium, cobalt, iron, molybdenum, thallium, tin, titanium, urardum and <br />vanadium. <br />Although the commercial/ industrial exposure scenario is not the same as the expected post- <br />mining land use of the property (e.g., non-motorized recreation), RSLs provided for this <br />scenario are conservative; that is, the scenario provides additional human health exposure to <br />metals on the site than what is anticipated given the anticipated post-mining land use. For <br />example, commercial/ industrial workers are exposed 250 days per year compared to 40 days <br />per year for the BLM worker. No maximum concentrations of additional metals evaluated using <br />RSLs (Table 4-1) exceed screening criteria, indicating that constituents not considered by BLM <br />pose no toxic-forming threat for direct contact. <br />4.1.4 Background Soil Concentrations <br />All inorganic constituents detected in development rock at Sunday Group mines occur <br />naturally in soil and rock. Thus, some level of these constituents will be found in development <br />rock that is unrelated to mining activity. Background soil concentrations for soils in the area <br />near the mine and shown in Table 4-3 were developed based on guidance provided in the <br />Proposed Soil Remediation Objectives Policy Document (CDPHE 1997). The guidance identifies <br />the creation of Tier 1 soil remediation objectives based on a statistical analysis of background <br />soil samples. A total of nine background soil samples were collected within the vicinity of the <br />Sunday Mines Group but in areas that were either upwind or upslope of development rock and <br />ore piles. <br />Table 3-3 shows background concentrations of total metals in soil. These data were analyzed <br />initially using basic statistics (average, standard deviation, and coefficient of variation). As <br />defined in the guidance (CDPHE 1997), constituents with a coefficient of variation less than one <br />can be considered normally distributed. For analytes that met this criterion, background soil <br />concentrations for comparison with measured concentrations in development rock were <br />calculated as the average plus two times the standard deviation. For barium, the coefficient of <br />variation was greater than one and estimate for background soil concentration was determined <br />from log-transformed data. • <br />cm 4-6 <br />7:164986-Denison Mira3slTask Order 3 - DMO Sampling and Anaysis PlaMTask 3.12 - Soil, Ore, Rock Data Assessment Report%Sunday Rock ReporMinel report\Reporffinal Sunday Mine. Group Soil Ore Rock <br />Data Assessment Reporl_051509.doc