My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2009-05-19_REVISION - M1981021 (32)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1981021
>
2009-05-19_REVISION - M1981021 (32)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/15/2021 2:18:37 PM
Creation date
5/27/2009 10:16:47 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1981021
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
5/19/2009
Doc Name
EPP (AM-01) Attachment A: Transport; Att.B,1,2 Geochem. (part 2)
From
Denison Mines
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
AM1
Email Name
RCO
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
123
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Section 4 <br />Potential for Rock to be Toxic-Forming <br />The bioavailability estimate for one sample, SVWR-1_MAG, was 136 percent, likely reflecting <br />difficulties with precision for low levels of arsenic. Bioavailabihty for the whole soil for this <br />sample was 63 percent, the highest for any of the re-run samples. For another sample, SJWR-1- <br />NON, arsenic was not detected in the simulated stomach fluid and no bioavailability estimate <br />could be estimated. Lack of detection of arsenic in this sample suggests low bioavailability. In <br />the companion sample, SJWR-I-MAG, bioavailability was low (27 percent) and thus consistent <br />with this conclusion. <br />Overall, the highest bioavailability not subject to methodological problems that was observed in <br />the re-analysis of development rock samples from Sunday Group mines was 63 percent. This <br />value is considered a conservative estimate of arsenic bioavailability. The use of this value for <br />arsenic in development rock is further discussed below using the results of the electron <br />microprobe analysis. <br />A complete report on the results of the microprobe analysis is provided as Attachment 1. In <br />general, arsenic was found in development rock samples within iron sulfide and uranium <br />minerals at fairly high concentrations (up to 10,000 mg/kg). However, because these minerals <br />are rare, the overall concentration of arsenic is much lower - not exceeding 45 mg/kg in any of <br />the development rock samples collected. Most of the iron sulfides are likely pyrite in crystalline <br />forms. These forms are likely to be stable in stomach fluids and thus have limited <br />bioavailability. Some framboidal forms of pyrite also exist, but are relatively less abundant. <br />These forms could dissolve in stomach fluid and thus arsenic associated with these forms <br />would be available for uptake into the body. In addition, some iron oxyhydroxides which <br />• would also be more soluble in stomach fluid than crystalline sulfides; arsenic associated with <br />these forms may also be available for absorption. <br />Dr. John Drexler with the Laboratory for Environmental and Geological Studies at the <br />University of Colorado maintains a data table used by EPA Region 8 as a "library" of mineral <br />forms and there relative stability in stomach fluid. Based on telephone conversations with Dr. <br />Drexler (CDM 2009b), the library contains no samples with sulfides and no samples with <br />uranium or vanadium minerals which could be used as relative RBA comparison to the Sunday <br />Mines Group data. Samples containing arsenic associated with iron oxyhydroxides are <br />represented in the table. A sample with 69 percent of the arsenic in iron oxyhydroxides had an <br />RBA value of 38 percent. A sample with 40 percent of the arsenic in iron oxyhydroxides had an <br />RBA value of 51 percent. <br />The weight-of-evidence protocol, using in vitro assay, mircroprobe analyses to determine <br />mineralogy of arsenic in developmental rock, and comparison of values in the EPA Region 8 <br />library, appears to support an RBA value of 63 percent or less for the Sunday Mines Group <br />development rock. Much of the arsenic is associated with crystalline iron sulfide (probably <br />pyrite) which would be stable in stomach fluid. The highest concentration of arsenic found in <br />any soil particle examined was found in associated with crystalline iron sulfide. Other forms of <br />arsenic were encounter less frequently. These more soluble forms suggest that some arsenic <br />would be available of uptake into the body. However, even when a high percentage of arsenic <br />was associated with iron oxyhydroxides - a form associated with relatively high availability - <br />bioavailability was not more than 51 percent. Thus, an estimate of 63 percent for development <br />. rock from the Sunday Group can be anticipated to adequately (and conservatively) represent <br />potential uptake of arsenic after accidental soil ingestion. <br />cm 4-5 <br />TAS4986 3eniaon MineslTask Order 3 - DMO Sampling and Analysis Plan%Task 3.12 - Soil, Ore, Rack Data Assessment ReporOSunday Rack Reporiltinal reporttReporAFinat Sunday Mines Gmp Soil Ore Rock <br />Date Assessment Repott_051509Aoc
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.